Geoengineering refers to the deliberate large-scale intervention in the Earth's climate system to counteract climate change, such as by reflecting sunlight, increasing precipitation, or removing CO2 from the atmosphere. Proponents argue that geoengineering could provide innovative solutions to global warming. Opponents argue that it is risky, unproven, and could have unforeseen negative consequences.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Constituency
Parish
Response rates from 232 Cities of London and Westminster voters.
78% Yes |
22% No |
78% Yes |
22% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 232 Cities of London and Westminster voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 232 Cities of London and Westminster voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Cities of London and Westminster voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9ZNDRC46 days6D
Yes but not too much as we our main way to combat climate change should be through green energy if thats solar panels, hydro electricity and more
@9ZM26SR1wk1W
Invest in renewable energy, reduction of non-recyclables etc. Look after our planet and we won’t need to introduce further intrusions into its climate.
@9QGB3RQ5mos5MO
I think more research is needed but proof that we won't cause any more negative and/or detrimental damage
@9QKGT8Q5mos5MO
No, not at the moment. I support environmental action but it shouldn't be a priority over the economy and public services.
@9QKFV9R5mos5MO
I would like to see a proven test on this before a commitment is made as this is our planets future and not to be taken lightly.
@9QKCNGQ5mos5MO
I would have to research more into what geoengineering means before fully supporting it or not. in theory I am 100% for research to combat climate change, as long as that in itself isn't causing more harm to the environment / species.
@9QGTR275mos5MO
I think that this is worthy of investigation. But should not be acted upon until it is fully understood.
@9QB6XMS5mos5MO
Yes, but they should also be funding more sustainable fuel sources to reduce reliance on fossil fuels
Join in on the most popular conversations.
