+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 176 SO voters.

80%
Yes
20%
No
80%
Yes
20%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 176 SO voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 176 SO voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from SO voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZNDRC4answered…1wk1W

Yes but not too much as we our main way to combat climate change should be through green energy if thats solar panels, hydro electricity and more

 @9ZM26SRanswered…2wks2W

Invest in renewable energy, reduction of non-recyclables etc. Look after our planet and we won’t need to introduce further intrusions into its climate.

 @9QGB3RQanswered…5mos5MO

I think more research is needed but proof that we won't cause any more negative and/or detrimental damage

 @9QKGT8Qanswered…5mos5MO

No, not at the moment. I support environmental action but it shouldn't be a priority over the economy and public services.

 @9QKFV9Ranswered…5mos5MO

I would like to see a proven test on this before a commitment is made as this is our planets future and not to be taken lightly.

 @9QKCNGQanswered…5mos5MO

I would have to research more into what geoengineering means before fully supporting it or not. in theory I am 100% for research to combat climate change, as long as that in itself isn't causing more harm to the environment / species.

 @9QGTR27answered…5mos5MO

I think that this is worthy of investigation. But should not be acted upon until it is fully understood.

 @9QB6XMSanswered…5mos5MO

Yes, but they should also be funding more sustainable fuel sources to reduce reliance on fossil fuels