+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 251 Non-Civil Parish or Community voters.

80%
Yes
20%
No
80%
Yes
20%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 251 Non-Civil Parish or Community voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 251 Non-Civil Parish or Community voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Non-Civil Parish or Community voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZNDRC4answered…6 days6D

Yes but not too much as we our main way to combat climate change should be through green energy if thats solar panels, hydro electricity and more

 @9ZM26SRanswered…1wk1W

Invest in renewable energy, reduction of non-recyclables etc. Look after our planet and we won’t need to introduce further intrusions into its climate.

 @9QGB3RQanswered…5mos5MO

I think more research is needed but proof that we won't cause any more negative and/or detrimental damage

 @9QKGT8Qanswered…5mos5MO

No, not at the moment. I support environmental action but it shouldn't be a priority over the economy and public services.

 @9QKFV9Ranswered…5mos5MO

I would like to see a proven test on this before a commitment is made as this is our planets future and not to be taken lightly.

 @9QKCNGQanswered…5mos5MO

I would have to research more into what geoengineering means before fully supporting it or not. in theory I am 100% for research to combat climate change, as long as that in itself isn't causing more harm to the environment / species.

 @9QGTR27answered…5mos5MO

I think that this is worthy of investigation. But should not be acted upon until it is fully understood.

 @9QB6XMSanswered…5mos5MO

Yes, but they should also be funding more sustainable fuel sources to reduce reliance on fossil fuels