These subsidies are financial aids from the government to help individuals purchase their first home, making homeownership more accessible. Proponents argue that it helps people afford their first home and promotes homeownership. Opponents argue that it distorts the housing market and could lead to higher prices.
81% Yes |
19% No |
81% Yes |
19% No |
See how support for each position on “First-time Homebuyer Subsidies” has changed over time for 4.5k UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “First-time Homebuyer Subsidies” has changed over time for 4.5k UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from UK users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9MS69VL2wks2W
No, the money should be used to build more social housing
@9NHMTMF4 days4D
Housing market needs reforming for all, not just first time buyers. Government needs to address the systemic issues around buying a home
@9NGXPVV4 days4D
they should force the banks and building societies to refresh their lending criteria. People are able to rent at a high cost but not take out a mortgage that would reduce their outgoings. This should not be allowed to continue.
@9NFPBYT5 days5D
No, they should address systemic causes of overinflated property values due to being considered a commodity over a right to a permanent residence
@9N92YL21wk1W
No, the government should seek to lower the cost of homes in general / reform the housing market, rather than perpetuate the status quo.
@9N5GPRM1wk1W
Yes, but depends on age, current living situation, marital status, annual income, and what house they're looking at. with houses under a certain price.
Explore other topics that are important to UK voters.
