+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 503 G voters.

79%
Yes
21%
No
79%
Yes
21%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 503 G voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 503 G voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from G voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9P34Q94answered…6mos6MO

Renting should be a feasible, affordable and respectable option so that people are not over stretched into home owning.

 @9NWR5H7answered…6mos6MO

Yes but this should be assessed on a case-by-case basis with assistance reflective of the circumstances.

 @8SZTB3Z answered…4mos4MO

People who have gambled upon expensive properties which they could have never afforded in the first place deserve no sympathy. People in the mainstream and the lower end of the economy should be offered support so that they do not become homeless.

 @9QWDBPManswered…5mos5MO

Yes, as long as they are in. a job (excluding of course extra circumstances such as they have a disability)

 @9QR2TCSanswered…5mos5MO

No, unless its due to a sudden health issue, whoch the government should give a choice for them to sell their home and move to social housing or sell their home to a housing organisation.

 @9QLQ7PD answered…5mos5MO

Depending on the circumstance but in this current financial climate yes as its the governments fault we are in a economic crisis whereby people are struggling basic necessities so if there house is not excessive to their requirements then yes if they are trying to live within their means then yes they should help

 @9QKKF7Hanswered…5mos5MO

Possibly. If a home is about to be repossesed, everything possible should be done to prevent this. Repossession has long teaching effects on many areas - the most obvious being financial. People potentially facing repossession should have mandatory financial counselling and assistance - maybe even meetings with financial advisor, CAB and homeowner. At this point if felt to be worthwhile, some assistance could be offered.

 @9QJWJ69answered…5mos5MO

Yes, but only in certain circumstances, such as temporary (medical) issues having been the cause of the financial problems. If the medical issues are permanent, then the government should pay until suitable alternative housing can be provided that is affordable for the homeowners and that should be sold to that homeowner rather than rented.