+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 490 Democratic Socialism voters.

81%
Yes
19%
No
81%
Yes
19%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 490 Democratic Socialism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 490 Democratic Socialism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Democratic Socialism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9PJSJT8answered…5mos5MO

Yes but only if they don’t harm others, eg smart motorways removing hard shoulder = less chance of survival

 @9MY5PP3answered…6mos6MO

 @9QLBZN8answered…5mos5MO

Yes, only if it is accompanied by reducing the amount of car traffic on the road alongside the development of affordable public transport that is owned by the public

 @9QK3MJLanswered…5mos5MO

Only if self-funded and not offered to private organisations, turns into a waste of money that never ends up getting delivered, too much profiteering. Hire directly for departments and resolve in-house.

 @9QDKMQ4answered…5mos5MO

NO! They should invest in the infrastructure to maintain the quality of the roads for ALL users. They have an MOT to make cars roadworthy, but the roads aren’t car-worthy as they are at the moment.

 @9Q2MYRXanswered…5mos5MO

Repair the basic state of the roads first. Repair potholes, clean roadsigns, repaint lines on the road etc

 @9PXRY2Tanswered…5mos5MO

It depends on what mode of transport, maybe public transport should be developed but not personal vehicles which would contribute more to CO2 emissions.

 @9MXFG7Nanswered…6mos6MO

Invest in maintenance of current infrastructure roads and improve rail and bus services