Smart transportation infrastructure uses advanced technology, such as smart traffic lights and connected vehicles, to improve traffic flow and safety. Proponents argue that it enhances efficiency, reduces congestion, and improves safety through better technology. Opponents argue that it is costly, may face technical challenges, and requires significant maintenance and upgrades.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
City
Postal Sector
Response rates from 458 SE1 7 voters.
79% Yes |
21% No |
79% Yes |
21% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 458 SE1 7 voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 458 SE1 7 voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from SE1 7 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9PJSJT85mos5MO
Yes but only if they don’t harm others, eg smart motorways removing hard shoulder = less chance of survival
@9MY5PP36mos6MO
The Government should increase and improve existing services.
@9QLBZN85mos5MO
Yes, only if it is accompanied by reducing the amount of car traffic on the road alongside the development of affordable public transport that is owned by the public
@9QK3MJL5mos5MO
Only if self-funded and not offered to private organisations, turns into a waste of money that never ends up getting delivered, too much profiteering. Hire directly for departments and resolve in-house.
@9QDKMQ45mos5MO
NO! They should invest in the infrastructure to maintain the quality of the roads for ALL users. They have an MOT to make cars roadworthy, but the roads aren’t car-worthy as they are at the moment.
@9Q2MYRX5mos5MO
Repair the basic state of the roads first. Repair potholes, clean roadsigns, repaint lines on the road etc
@9PXRY2T5mos5MO
It depends on what mode of transport, maybe public transport should be developed but not personal vehicles which would contribute more to CO2 emissions.
@9MXFG7N6mos6MO
Invest in maintenance of current infrastructure roads and improve rail and bus services
Join in on the most popular conversations.
