This question considers whether maintaining and repairing current infrastructure should take precedence over constructing new roads and bridges. Proponents argue that it ensures safety, extends the life of existing infrastructure, and is more cost-effective. Opponents argue that new infrastructure is needed to support growth and improve transportation networks.
85% Yes |
15% No |
85% Yes |
15% No |
See how support for each position on “Road Maintenance vs. New Infrastructure” has changed over time for 2.4k UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Road Maintenance vs. New Infrastructure” has changed over time for 2.4k UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from UK users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9NGXBJ54 days4D
No. Only after public transportation have been privatized and controlled to provide a higher efficiency service
@9NGGN4S4 days4D
The approach should be neither 'new for new's sake' nor keeping old infrastructure running when it is obsolete - projects should be thoroughly appraised for efficacy, cost-effectiveness, environmental impact and public value.
@9N953951wk1W
There should be a prioritisation of which infrastructure is needed to be built v fixed. Infrastructure is a long term investment and without it we cannot expect growth.
@9MY3GGR 2wks2W
All infrastructure should eventually become privatised
@9MXBKM92wks2W
Both but this country cannot do infrastructure anyway
@9MWW8TC2wks2W
New infrastructure is equally as important as maintaining current roads
Explore other topics that are important to UK voters.
