+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 9.1k UK voters.

84%
Yes
16%
No
84%
Yes
16%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 9.1k UK voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 9.1k UK voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from UK voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9P2LXDGanswered…8mos8MO

Yes, prioritise the maintenance and repair of existing road and bridges. However, replace where necessary

 @9ZZ9XF2answered…2mos2MO

Partially for maintenance, repair. Otherwise, replace with more efficient yet aesthetically pleasing infrastructure.

 @9ZL4RGHanswered…3mos3MO

They should be a healthy balance between these two issues. Both repairing/maintaining existing infrastructure and building new infrastructure is equally important/vital

 @9SKBZR9answered…6mos6MO

Prioritize what needs prioritizing. If there is a road that needs vitals repairs, it should be done; if there is space where a road can be built that would improve the commute for a lot of people, it should be done. If we are building a bridge for the sake of building a bridge.. do better

 @8SZTB3Z answered…6mos6MO

The two are not mutually exclusive and both should have priority depending upon local circumstances.

 @9QM465Janswered…7mos7MO

It depends on the nature of the infrastructure and how critical it is to the functioning of the country and local community

 @9QLS4M2answered…7mos7MO

They, should prioritze the maintenance and repair of existing roads and bridges until building new infrastructure replaces the need to repair an existing road or bridge

 @9Q8DQSLanswered…7mos7MO

Both the construction of new infrastructure and investment in existing infrastructure should be given equal priority.