A national identification system is a standardized ID system that provides a unique identification number or card to all citizens, which can be used to verify identity and access various services. Proponents argue that it enhances security, streamlines identification processes, and helps prevent identity fraud. Opponents argue that it raises privacy concerns, could lead to increased government surveillance, and may infringe on individual freedoms.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Parish
Response rates from 634 Bexley London voters.
72% Yes |
28% No |
72% Yes |
28% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 634 Bexley London voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 634 Bexley London voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Bexley London voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9PDS7HM6mos6MO
The systems we already have, such as passports, driving licence and national insurance number should be bolstered to enhance security
@9Q23Y7V5mos5MO
I feel that many forms of identification already exist that facilitate these systems. Will investigate further
@9ZW79RV5 days5D
Yes but an independent agency will be able to monitor the government to prevent misuse of the national identification system
@9ZH2VY33wks3W
More details needed. If we got issued a photo I'd with out NI number that would be helpful. But I DO NOT think that people should be required to present I'd any more than they already are
@9ZCDW2L4wks4W
It wouldn't work. The people of this country are already treated as criminals. We are, for example, all treated as money launderers, unable to even pay cash into our own accounts or those of our family. We are subjected to so many checks, when the actual money launderers are getting away with everything!
@9YJ5H5P4wks4W
Yes, but only if it includes strict data privacy protections, independent oversight, and clear limitations on its use
@9QHQTWS5mos5MO
No. It's another controlling scam to give contracts to InfoSys and introduce mass surveillance like China.
@9QHKN8N5mos5MO
If it still respects privacy, yes, but if it removes face to face interaction absolutely not. we're too reliant on technology.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
