+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 277 BN voters.

58%
Yes
42%
No
58%
Yes
42%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 277 BN voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 277 BN voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from BN voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9Q4WCJBanswered…7mos7MO

Yes, as long as the government can provide significant, tangible evidence that all other conventional methods have been exhausted

 @9MWR5QRanswered…8mos8MO

Yes, only when significant evidence suggests a risk to national security and safety.

 @9PXL2XK answered…7mos7MO

Yes, but should have a separate division of the government that is bound by confidentiality and can only use information that clearly indicates criminal activity that’s verified by multiple impartial parties to insure information from communications isn’t being used incorrectly

 @9Q2PZ3S answered…7mos7MO

Only with a court order/warrant in extreme cases such as the need to thwart a violent act against innocent civilians. The proof required would need to be substantial as this power could be seriously abused.

 @B2L227Nanswered…2 days2D

Yes but only if there is a reason to do so, any government official who abuses it will face criminal charges

 @B25TFRQanswered…1mo1MO

Yes, but there should be strict rules for it's usage and an independent agency to ensure it is used properly

 @9ZT9MVGanswered…2mos2MO

Yes, but the government should only be allowed to se criminals and suspected criminals encrypted communications.

 @9ZPM94Nanswered…2mos2MO

Depends, If the government give evidence that specific individual or individuals have committed a crime in the uk or other countries but they will have to show the evidence.