Backdoor access means that tech companies would create a way for government authorities to bypass encryption, allowing them to access private communications for surveillance and investigation. Proponents argue that it helps law enforcement and intelligence agencies prevent terrorism and criminal activities by providing necessary access to information. Opponents argue that it compromises user privacy, weakens overall security, and could be exploited by malicious actors.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Parish
Response rates from 431 RG voters.
53% Yes |
47% No |
53% Yes |
47% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 431 RG voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 431 RG voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from RG voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9Q4WCJB5mos5MO
Yes, as long as the government can provide significant, tangible evidence that all other conventional methods have been exhausted
@9MWR5QR6mos6MO
Yes, only when significant evidence suggests a risk to national security and safety.
@9PXL2XK 5mos5MO
Yes, but should have a separate division of the government that is bound by confidentiality and can only use information that clearly indicates criminal activity that’s verified by multiple impartial parties to insure information from communications isn’t being used incorrectly
@9Q2PZ3S 5mos5MO
Only with a court order/warrant in extreme cases such as the need to thwart a violent act against innocent civilians. The proof required would need to be substantial as this power could be seriously abused.
@9VRG59G1mo1MO
Yes, but such backdoor access should be available only if the government gets a court order pursuant to law and judicial process allowing access to the encrypted information.
@9VPRN9V1mo1MO
Yes, but for the sole purpose of stopping crime and not to see in on private, domestic conversations.
@9QJ2FCD5mos5MO
There should be system where govenrment's interest and weighed and then decision should be made by tech companies or an independent board.
@9QHWQLX5mos5MO
Yes but not for fishing or snooping for criminal evidence, affiliations, political views in private communications. Only when national security risk is suspected.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
