Temporary housing refers to short-term accommodations provided for those without permanent residence, in this case to support immigrants and refugees as they settle in a new country. Proponents argue that increasing temporary housing offers humane and stable support for newcomers, easing their transition and helping communities manage arrivals. Opponents argue that expanding temporary housing may strain public resources, affect local housing markets, and that other solutions may be more sustainable.
Response rates from 477 UK voters.
40% Yes |
60% No |
40% Yes |
60% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 477 UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 477 UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from UK voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B25N3ZZ5 days5D
housing for our own before Immigrants and reugee's
@9Z9KQ6K 6 days6D
No, I believe a better solution is to expand social housing as this can help contribute to temporary housing for refugees but also help citizens be able to rent a home.
@B25K6V86 days6D
Yes, unless they're anti western terrorist men in which case send them back after a night
@9ZWDD6Q3wks3W
As long as they also increase housing for permanent residents
@9ZSRHLC4wks4W
No, if someone is here on a visa they should pay for their own housing, refugees should be placed in designated areas
@9ZK96YS1mo1MO
Only if they are refugees or immigrants wanting to be involved in working in this nation
@9ZK7QND1mo1MO
Provide the housing requried for the volume of people. Improve the process to enable refugees to work as soon as they arrive and thereby give back.
@9ZK4LL21mo1MO
Yes but only if they have come to the country legally
Join in on the most popular conversations.
