Temporary housing refers to short-term accommodations provided for those without permanent residence, in this case to support immigrants and refugees as they settle in a new country. Proponents argue that increasing temporary housing offers humane and stable support for newcomers, easing their transition and helping communities manage arrivals. Opponents argue that expanding temporary housing may strain public resources, affect local housing markets, and that other solutions may be more sustainable.
Response rates from 446 Volt UK voters.
41% Yes |
59% No |
41% Yes |
59% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 446 Volt UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 446 Volt UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Volt UK voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B28L8Q81wk1W
No. Any refuge should be temporary, or better still they should all be relocated back to safe zones in their own continents.
@B27MZBS2wks2W
Yes, in proper houses or apartments, not prison ships
@B26VW793wks3W
Yes, and build more housing for the homeless and those who are awaiting citizenship
@B25N3ZZ3wks3W
housing for our own before Immigrants and reugee's
@9Z9KQ6K 3wks3W
No, I believe a better solution is to expand social housing as this can help contribute to temporary housing for refugees but also help citizens be able to rent a home.
@B25K6V84wks4W
Yes, unless they're anti western terrorist men in which case send them back after a night
@9ZWDD6Q1mo1MO
As long as they also increase housing for permanent residents
@9ZSRHLC2mos2MO
No, if someone is here on a visa they should pay for their own housing, refugees should be placed in designated areas
Join in on the most popular conversations.
