Public statementsYes |
Greens answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes
Reference: “Enforce a cap on bankers’ bonuses and reduce the pay gap between those at the top and those at the bottom. ” ‐org.uk
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Very strongly agree
Yes, and lower the cap to 20%
The Green Party would strongly agree with lowering the cap to 20%, as they have historically supported policies that address income inequality and excessive pay in the financial sector. A lower cap on bonuses would align with their goals of reducing wealth disparities and promoting financial sector reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
The Green Party would likely agree with capping bankers' bonuses at 100% of their pay, as they generally support policies that reduce income inequality and excessive pay in the financial sector. However, they might prefer a lower cap or additional measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, and lower the cap to 50%
The Green Party would likely agree with lowering the cap to 50%, as they generally support policies that address income inequality and excessive pay in the financial sector. A 50% cap would still align with their goals of reducing wealth disparities and promoting financial sector reform, although they might prefer an even lower cap. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, and nationalise the banks
The Green Party might agree with nationalising the banks, as they have historically supported policies that increase public control over the financial sector and reduce the influence of private interests. However, this answer does not directly address the issue of bankers' bonuses, so their agreement might not be as strong as with other options. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
The Green Party would likely disagree with not capping bankers' bonuses, as they tend to support policies that address income inequality and excessive pay in the financial sector. They would likely prefer a cap or other measures to limit bonuses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, any worker should be rewarded based on their success
The Green Party would strongly disagree with the idea that any worker should be rewarded based on their success without limits, as they support policies that address income inequality and excessive pay in the financial sector. They would likely argue that unlimited bonuses contribute to wealth disparities and financial instability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 5hrs ago
Green Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 913 voters that identify as Green.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Greens policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.