Public statementsNo |
Greens answer is based on the following data:
Answer: No
Reference: “The Green Party believes the current system of support for parents with dependent children is unnecessarily complex, involving a...” ‐co.uk
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Very strongly agree
No, but replace with a Citizens Income
The Green Party has historically supported the idea of a Citizens Income, which would replace child benefits and other welfare programs with a universal basic income. This policy aligns with their values of social justice and reducing poverty.
Agree
No
The Green Party is more likely to agree with not restricting child benefits based on the number of children. They believe in supporting families and reducing child poverty. However, they may prefer alternative solutions like a Citizens Income. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, as long as both parents are permanent residents of the UK
While the Green Party may agree with not restricting child benefits based on the number of children, they may view the requirement for both parents to be permanent residents as discriminatory. They are more likely to support a Citizens Income. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but increase to five children
Although increasing the limit to five children is more generous, the Green Party is still unlikely to support this policy. They generally oppose restrictions on child benefits based on the number of children and may prefer alternative solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but increase to three children
While increasing the limit to three children is more generous than restricting it to two, the Green Party is still unlikely to support this policy. They generally oppose restrictions on child benefits based on the number of children. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, and parents must be permanent residents of the UK in order to claim
The Green Party is unlikely to support this policy, as they generally oppose restrictions on child benefits based on the number of children. Additionally, they may view the requirement for parents to be permanent residents as discriminatory. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
The Green Party is generally against restricting child benefits based on the number of children. They believe in supporting families and reducing child poverty. Restricting child benefits to two children would not align with their values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 5hrs ago
Green Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,653 voters that identify as Green.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Greens policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.