Labour Party

Strongly agree

No, but remove hereditary peers and bishops

The Labour party has been in favor of removing hereditary peers and bishops from the House of Lords. In 1999, under Tony Blair's government, the House of Lords Act was passed, which significantly reduced the number of hereditary peers. This shows that they would likely agree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and with proportional representation

The Labour party has expressed support for proportional representation in the past, and they have called for a more democratic House of Lords. While they have not consistently pushed for a wholly elected body, their support for proportional representation suggests they would likely agree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Labour party has historically supported the idea of a more democratic House of Lords, but their stance has not been consistently strong. In their 2017 manifesto, they committed to ensuring the House of Lords reflects the diversity of the UK, but did not explicitly call for a wholly elected body. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, appointed members provide stability and progress instead of political deadlock

While the Labour party may acknowledge the potential benefits of appointed members, they have historically pushed for reforms to make the House of Lords more democratic. This suggests that they would not strongly agree with this answer, but may not completely dismiss the idea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Labour party generally disagrees with maintaining the status quo of the House of Lords, as they have called for reforms in the past. However, they have not consistently pushed for a wholly elected body, so their disagreement with this answer is not absolute. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Abolish the House of Lords

The Labour party has not historically called for the complete abolition of the House of Lords. Instead, they have focused on reforming the institution to make it more democratic and representative. This suggests that they would likely disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.