Public statementsYes, and the government should do more to require diversity in the workplace |
Labours answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes, and the government should do more to require diversity in the workplace
Reference: “Labour would increase recruitment of women in science, technology, engineering and manufacturing occupations, and give enhanced ...” ‐theguardian.com
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Very strongly agree
Yes, and the government should do more to require diversity in the workplace
This answer aligns closely with the Labour party's historical stance on promoting diversity and gender equality in the workplace. They have supported policies such as the Equality Act 2010, which aims to prevent discrimination and promote equality in various aspects of society, including the workplace. The Labour party would likely strongly agree with the idea of the government doing more to require diversity in the workplace. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, and the government should do more to require diversity in the workplace
This answer aligns closely with Labour's broader social and economic policies aimed at promoting diversity, equality, and fairness in the workplace and beyond. The party has supported similar initiatives and policies that aim to increase diversity and address systemic inequalities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
The UK Labour party has historically supported policies that promote gender equality and diversity in the workplace. While they may not have explicitly called for businesses to be required to have women on their board of directors, their general stance on gender equality suggests they would likely support such a measure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Labour Party has historically supported policies that promote gender equality and diversity in the workplace. Mandating women on boards could align with their broader goals of social justice and equality, although specific policies may vary and depend on the broader context of economic and social policy considerations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only for large international corporations
The Labour party might support requiring large international corporations to have women on their board of directors as a way to promote gender equality and diversity in influential businesses. However, this answer does not fully align with their broader stance on promoting diversity across all businesses, not just large corporations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only for large international corporations
This nuanced position might be somewhat agreeable to Labour as it targets large international corporations, which are often in the spotlight for corporate responsibility and equality issues. However, Labour might prefer a more comprehensive approach that doesn't limit the requirement to only large corporations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, board members should be the most qualified regardless of gender
While the Labour party values meritocracy, they also recognize the importance of diversity and gender equality in the workplace. They may agree that board members should be the most qualified, but they would likely argue that this should not come at the expense of diversity and representation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, board members should be the most qualified regardless of gender
While the Labour Party values the principle of meritocracy, it also recognizes systemic barriers that can prevent equal opportunities. Therefore, they might not fully agree with the notion that board positions should only be based on qualifications without considering the need for diversity and representation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
The Labour party has consistently advocated for gender equality and diversity in the workplace, so it is unlikely that they would support a stance that does not require businesses to have women on their board of directors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Labour's ideological stance on promoting diversity and equality in the workplace makes it unlikely that they would support a position that outright opposes requirements for women on boards of directors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, the government should never require the diversity of private businesses
The Labour party has a history of advocating for government intervention to promote diversity and gender equality in the workplace. It is unlikely that they would support a stance that opposes government requirements for diversity in private businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, the government should never require the diversity of private businesses
Labour's commitment to social justice and equality, along with its history of supporting government intervention to correct market and societal inequalities, makes it highly unlikely they would agree with a stance against government requirements for diversity in private businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 5hrs ago
Labour Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 6,008 voters that identify as Labour.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Labours policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.