SDP Party

Strongly agree

Yes, but only by court order

This approach aligns well with the SDP Party's values of balancing security with civil liberties. Requiring a court order for surveillance respects the rule of law and individual rights, which would be in line with their principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications

Given their centrist and civil liberties-oriented stance, the SDP Party would likely support legislation that aims to protect citizen communications from government surveillance, provided that such legislation also includes provisions for national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

While the SDP Party values security, it also places a high importance on individual freedoms and privacy. They would likely support some level of oversight on government surveillance to protect these rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism

The SDP Party might agree that combating terrorism is a priority, but they would also stress the importance of balancing this with the protection of civil liberties. Their support would be cautious and likely contingent on strict oversight and transparency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds

The SDP Party would have mixed feelings about this approach. On one hand, it targets surveillance more narrowly, which aligns with respecting individual freedoms. On the other hand, it could be seen as discriminatory or as a slippery slope to broader surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The SDP Party, being a centrist party that values civil liberties, would likely be cautious about blanket government surveillance without safeguards. Their stance would be more nuanced, favoring targeted measures over broad monitoring. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.