+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 3.3k Camden London voters.

28%
Yes
72%
No
20%
Yes
52%
No
4%
Yes, but increase oversight
13%
No, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead
4%
Yes, but not in heavily populated areas
7%
No, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 3.3k Camden London voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 3.3k Camden London voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Camden London voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @5DTCF9Lanswered…4yrs4Y

 @9RLR2W3answered…4mos4MO

Temporarily whilst we are rebuilding our nuclear energy capacity, and pursuing more sustainable energy resources.

 @9Q7M2K7answered…5mos5MO

If it is necessary to help provide the amount of energy that is needed, but ideally prefer more sustainable energy

 @9Q77S2Ganswered…5mos5MO

Only for necessary reasons, but we shall keep using those until we find a better solution that is better for the planet, the animals, and us as humans.

 @9Q63578answered…5mos5MO

The real facts of the dangers and safety need to be shared but not by oil and gas lobbyists or any parties that have a stake in it.

 @9PX66R2answered…5mos5MO

Yes but only to a level that still allows sustainability, and in non populated areas so damage to people and property is greatly reduced

 @9PX32Y3answered…5mos5MO

I think there will be a role for this technology to make sure the UK achieves energy security however I don't think this is currently at the top of the priority list.

 @9PVRV9Lanswered…5mos5MO

Yes but only in specific cases. There needs to be more regulation around what constitutes priority work vs not