+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 1.1k WD17 2 voters.

30%
Yes
70%
No
22%
Yes
49%
No
6%
Yes, but not in heavily populated areas
15%
No, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead
3%
Yes, but increase oversight
5%
No, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.1k WD17 2 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 1.1k WD17 2 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from WD17 2 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @5DTCF9Lanswered…4yrs4Y

 @9RLR2W3answered…4mos4MO

Temporarily whilst we are rebuilding our nuclear energy capacity, and pursuing more sustainable energy resources.

 @9Q7M2K7answered…5mos5MO

If it is necessary to help provide the amount of energy that is needed, but ideally prefer more sustainable energy

 @9Q77S2Ganswered…5mos5MO

Only for necessary reasons, but we shall keep using those until we find a better solution that is better for the planet, the animals, and us as humans.

 @9Q63578answered…5mos5MO

The real facts of the dangers and safety need to be shared but not by oil and gas lobbyists or any parties that have a stake in it.

 @9PX66R2answered…5mos5MO

Yes but only to a level that still allows sustainability, and in non populated areas so damage to people and property is greatly reduced

 @9PX32Y3answered…5mos5MO

I think there will be a role for this technology to make sure the UK achieves energy security however I don't think this is currently at the top of the priority list.

 @9PVRV9Lanswered…5mos5MO

Yes but only in specific cases. There needs to be more regulation around what constitutes priority work vs not