This policy would limit the amount a CEO can earn compared to the average salary of their employees. Proponents argue that it would reduce income inequality and ensure fairer compensation practices. Opponents argue that it would interfere with business autonomy and could discourage top executive talent.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
City
Postal District
Postal Sector
Response rates from 7.8k UK voters.
69% Yes |
31% No |
69% Yes |
31% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 7.8k UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 7.8k UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from UK voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9PVH7KB9mos9MO
Companies that provide basic utilities, as well as, health should all be capped unless they can perform better than expected.
@9PTKPZZ9mos9MO
I think there should be a cap but it would still need to be encouraging for those wanting to climb the ladder. There is a lot of responsibility as a ceo and the pay should reflect that responsibility.
@B2TRPG71mo1MO
CEO pay should be made up entirely of a fixed amount of shares, the higher the share price the more they make
@9QVJ4JV8mos8MO
Yes implement the 20:1 pay ratio rule which will help to reduce income inequality and exploration of workers.
@9QKSWMR8mos8MO
If the company does well then everyone should get a pay increase IF they have met their annual targets
@9QD2HSZ8mos8MO
There should be categories of business levels Privatised: Energy companies British rail BA Buse companies All former government companies should have capped dividends to shareholders aswell.
@9Q7Z36G8mos8MO
So long as the workers get compensation for their effort success will breed success from the lowliest operative to the CEO
@9Q6R8ZZ8mos8MO
yes providing the CEO has a majority share in company. Otherwise it should be determined by vote of shareholders.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
