+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 704 North West voters.

74%
Yes
26%
No
74%
Yes
26%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 704 North West voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 704 North West voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from North West voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9PWDD5L answered…5mos5MO

Yes in pure salty terms. Share based compensation should not be limited but there should be a threshold of CEO pay relative to employees to encourage salary increases across the company when companies experience growth and profits.

 @9PVH7KBanswered…5mos5MO

Companies that provide basic utilities, as well as, health should all be capped unless they can perform better than expected.

 @9PTKPZZanswered…5mos5MO

I think there should be a cap but it would still need to be encouraging for those wanting to climb the ladder. There is a lot of responsibility as a ceo and the pay should reflect that responsibility.

 @9QVJ4JVanswered…5mos5MO

Yes implement the 20:1 pay ratio rule which will help to reduce income inequality and exploration of workers.

 @9QKSWMRanswered…5mos5MO

If the company does well then everyone should get a pay increase IF they have met their annual targets

 @9QD2HSZanswered…5mos5MO

There should be categories of business levels Privatised: Energy companies British rail BA Buse companies All former government companies should have capped dividends to shareholders aswell.

 @9Q7Z36Ganswered…5mos5MO

So long as the workers get compensation for their effort success will breed success from the lowliest operative to the CEO

 @9Q6R8ZZanswered…5mos5MO

yes providing the CEO has a majority share in company. Otherwise it should be determined by vote of shareholders.