Try the political quiz

Greens policy on foreign assassination

Topics

Should the UK assassinate suspected terrorists in foreign countries?

  Public statementsNo, they should be captured and given a fair trial

Greens answer is based on the following data:

Public statements

Answer: No, they should be captured and given a fair trial

Reference: “But Ms Lucas and Baroness Jones - the party's sole representatives in Parliament - say there has been a lack of parliamentary sc...” ‐bbc.com

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No

The Green Party would strongly agree with this answer, as they believe in non-violent solutions and adherence to international law. They would argue that assassination is not an ethical or effective way to address terrorism and would instead advocate for diplomatic and legal means to address the issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, they should be captured and given a fair trial

The Green Party would likely agree with this answer, as it aligns with their commitment to non-violence, diplomacy, and adherence to international law. They believe in the importance of due process and the right to a fair trial, and would argue that this approach is more ethical and effective in addressing terrorism than assassination or other violent methods. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead

The Green Party would likely agree with this answer to some extent, as it emphasizes non-violent methods and the importance of gathering information. However, they might have concerns about the potential for human rights abuses during interrogation and imprisonment, and would likely advocate for strict adherence to international law and human rights standards in these processes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country

Similar to answer 3, the Green Party would likely disagree with this answer due to their commitment to non-violence and diplomacy. Even with undeniable evidence of a planned attack, they would argue for alternative methods to address the situation, such as diplomacy, legal action, and cooperation with international partners. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they have committed an attack against our country

While this answer includes a condition of undeniable evidence, the Green Party would still likely disagree with the use of assassination as a response to terrorism. Their core principles of peace and non-violence would lead them to advocate for alternative methods, such as diplomacy and legal action. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

The UK Green Party strongly opposes the use of violence and assassination as a means to address terrorism. They advocate for diplomacy, dialogue, and adherence to international law. Assassinating suspected terrorists goes against their core principles of peace and non-violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Updated 23mins ago

Party’s support base

Green Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 24,278 voters that identify as Green.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Greens policies? Take the political quiz to find out.