Should Members of Parliament be banned from holding paid second jobs?
The debate over MP second jobs centers on potential conflicts of interest versus the value of external experience. Critics, citing recent lobbying scandals, argue that paid consultancy roles allow corporations to buy political influence and distract MPs from their constituents. Defenders maintain that banning all second jobs would create a class of career politicians with no real-world skills and would unfairly penalize professionals like doctors or lawyers who wish to maintain their certifications while serving. Proponents argue that a strict ban restores public trust and integrity to the democratic process. Opponents argue that transparency measures are sufficient and that a ban would deter high-caliber candidates from entering politics.
Toggle voterbase
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Answer Overview
Response rates from 27.3k UK voters.
Historical Support
Trend of support over time for each answer from 27.3k UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Historical Importance
Trend of how important this issue is for 27.3k UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Other Popular Answers
Unique answers from UK voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@BF4WP5L3 days3D
@BF33HVW1wk1W
@BF2FD7X1wk1W
@BDZWMWS2wks2W
@BDZW4QD2wks2W
@BDYRW7C 2wks2W
@BDR2VJ31mo1MO
@PerplexedTheta 1mo1MO
Popular Conversations
Join in on the most popular conversations.
About This Data
Based on 27.3k responses to this question.
These results come from iSideWith's ongoing political issues survey. We collect over a million responses per day, filter out duplicate and multiple submissions, and break the results down by political party, ideology, age, state, and census demographics (income, race, education, household).
iSideWith is non-partisan — we don't advocate for any party, candidate, or position. We report what the public tells us.
Cite Or Embed This Poll
Writing about this issue? Use the live data and link back to the full results.




