@93K7SD7

iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.

Email Twitter Facebook YouTube Podcast Patreon

© 2025 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.

@93K7SD7

10 Discussions

Yes, but we must also regulate drugs so that they are of a comparable strength to alcohol.

Yes on the 50% rate, but only for an even higher level of income again.

Yes, and it should be regularly re-calculated against the cost of living.

No, but immigrants from high risk countries should be subject to more thorough screening.

We should regulate the strength of all mind-altering substances so that they are comparable to alcohol.

Yes, but they should be rehabilitated through other programs, such as community service and education.

No. Funding for social and community based programs should be in addition to, not instead of, police funding.

All strikes should be subject to independent enquiry to determine if they are fair.

Competition should be judged on comparable ability, and shouldn't be separated by sex.

Pro-Choice, but third trimester terminations should need exceptional medical grounds.

Discussions

Voter guides

Data & analytics

Candidates

About