Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Foreign Policy › Human Rights Act
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Healthcare › NHS Privatisation
4>4 Personal answerLess, and nationalise all health services |
Foreign Policy › European Union
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Immigration › Deportation of Suspected Terrorists
4>4 Personal answerNo, the definition of terrorism is too broad |
the Economy › Tax Evasion
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Education › Tuition Fees
4>4 Personal answerNo, but they should be reduced |
Education › Free School Meals
4>4 Personal answerYes, but only if they meet high nutritional standards |
the Economy › Tax Rate
4>4 Personal answerNo, but eliminate tax loopholes for top earners |
Social › Women in Combat
4>4 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Mansion Tax
4>4 Personal answerYes, especially since the government has issued the bedroom tax, targeting many lower income families. Having seen local residents forced to move out of their homes because they cannot afford the bedroom tax, they should also bring in the mansion tax. The wealthy have not seen any tax increases under this government, theirs have been cut, yet the lower class families have been far worse off especially due to services cut by the same government that's cutting taxes for the higher class. |
Healthcare › NHS Profit Reimbursement
4>4 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Welfare
4>4 Personal answerIt cannot be denied that there are frauds within the benefit system, and that some reform is needed. A possible idea is to implement a kosher like system. Bakeries that have a kosher license are able to be inspected at any time without warning, and if they fail to meet those requirements upon inspection, that license is removed. To make sure you do not end up with bureaucrats severely breaching the right to privacy, this kosher like check should happen twice a year, which is something that the recipient must agree to in order to claim benefits. If they are found to be dishonestly using that money for other gains, then it can be agreed whether to cut or scrap that person's benefits. |
the Economy › Inheritance Tax
4>4 Personal answerNo, reform so the tax rate is based on the wealth of the recipient rather than the deceased |
the Economy › Child Benefit
4>4 Personal answerNo, as long as both parents are permanent residents of the UK |
Education › Standardised Curriculum
4>4 Personal answerNo, teachers should teach to the needs of each student and region |
Education › GCSE Exams
4>4 Personal answerNo, vocational or skill based qualifications should also be available |
the Economy › Young Benefit Claimants
4>4 Personal answerYes, and every capable person claiming benefits should take on unpaid community work |
Domestic Policy › British Monarchy
4>4 Personal answerNo, they are a positive influence on tourism, charity, and international relations |
Domestic Policy › House of Lords
4>4 Personal answerThe Lords Spiritual must be removed, as it includes religion in state, and religion should not get a say in issues such as taxation. If the House of Lords is to become an elected chamber, then there should be different requirements to the House of Commons. This is because the House of Lords, whilst admittedly not democratic, has been a valuable check on the power of the House of Commons. They are much more serious than the jeering mess of the other chamber. To have a wholly elected body without separate requirements will leave the Lords to be another jeering house and leave a government with far too much power, since there will no longer be any other checks against them. |
Healthcare › Emergency Medical Care
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › National Service
4>4 Personal answerNo, service should be an option instead of obligation |
Immigration › Skilled Immigrants
4>4 Personal answerIncrease, our economy relies on businesses hiring the highest skilled workers at the lowest cost |
Foreign Policy › Trident Nuclear Weapons Programme
4>4 Personal answerNo, and divert the funds into health, education, and welfare initiatives |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
4>4 Personal answerNo, we should decriminalise most drugs |
Domestic Policy › West Lothian Question
4>4 Personal answerNo, only for legislation that has cross-border implications |
Education › Grammar Schools
4>4 Personal answerNo, focus on improving current standards instead |
Domestic Policy › Zero Hour Contracts
4>4 Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Genetically Modified Foods
4>4 Personal answerYes, but require the labelling of foods that are genetically modified |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
4>4 Personal answerYes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation |
the Economy › Bedroom Tax
4>4 Personal answerYes, but with exception for those with disabled family members |
Education › Free Schools
4>4 Personal answerNo, free schools divert money away from existing schools |
Domestic Policy › Devolved English Parliament
4>4 Personal answerYes, and more power should be given to regional governments |
Transportation › London Underground
4>4 Personal answerNo, and I will demonstrate my personal support |
the Economy › Buy to Let
4>4 Personal answerYes, but reduce tax evasion by landlords |
Domestic Policy › Welsh Assembly
4>4 Personal answerYes, provided England is granted the same |
Domestic Policy › Antisocial Behaviour Orders (ASBOs)
4>4 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Non-Domicile Rule
4>4 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Transportation › High Speed 2
4>4 Personal answerNo, we should improve existing rail networks instead |
the Economy › Bitcoin
4>4 Personal answerYes, but it should not replace our national treasury-backed currency |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is most important to you.
You are a centrist on environmentalism and anthropocentrism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on nationalism and globalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “left wing”, meaning you more often support policies that promote social and economic equality. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on multiculturalism and assimilation issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “big government”, meaning you more often believe the government should do more to address social inequality, corruption, and assistance for its citizens. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “decentralization”, meaning you believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on religious and secular issues. This theme is only least important to you.
You side slightly towards “militarism”, meaning you more often believe we should use whatever force necessary to protect ourselves against foreign threats. This theme is only least important to you.
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. This theme is only least important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.