How Longtermist Are You?

Should foreigners currently residing in the United Kingdom have the right to vote?

In order to vote in the UK a person must be 18 years old on election day and a be either a British, qualifying Commonwealth citizen or a citizen of the Republic of Ireland. In 2022 the government passed a law that allowed British nationals living overseas for more than 15 years to vote in UK general elections. The law could give the right to 3 million Britons retired or working abroad.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the minimum voting age be lowered?

The voting age for local elections in England, including mayoral and police and crime commissioner elections, is 18. The UK Government has no plans to lower the voting age for local elections in England. Scotland and Wales lowered the voting age to 16 for local and devolved elections.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should a politician who has been formerly convicted of a crime be allowed to run for office?

In 2017 Local Government Minister Marcus Jones set out plans to strengthen rules to prevent anyone found guilty of serious crimes from serving on local councils. Under the planned changes to criteria, it would ensure those who represent their communities are held to the highest possible standards. Current rules make clear that anyone convicted of an offence carrying a prison sentence of more than 3 months is banned from serving as a local councilor. Under the Representation of the People Act 1981, people are disqualified from becoming a member of the House of Commons if they have been found guilty of an offence and sentenced to more than one year in prison, and are currently detained as a result of that offence. Once they are released from prison, they are not prevented from standing for election as an MP.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should corporations, unions, and non-profit organizations be allowed to donate to political parties?

In the UK there are no limits on the amount of donations a political party may receive. Political parties may only accept donations over £200 from registered voters, party members, companies, trade union or a building society. Political parties may only spend £30,000 for each constituency that it contests in a general election. If a party ran a candidate in each of the 650 UK constituencies, its maximum spend would total £19.5m.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should political candidates be required to release their recent tax returns to the public?

A tax return is a document which states how much income an individual or entity reported to the government. In the UK these documents are considered private and are not released to the public. After David Cameron was named in the 2016 Panama Papers scandal top MP’s including Chancellor George Osborne and Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn published details of their tax returns. The UK Electoral Commission does not require individuals running for public offices to release them. In Sweden, Norway and Finland citizen’s and candidate’s tax records are considered public information and are published on the internet.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government use a "Proportional Representation" voting system?

First Past the Post (FPTP) is the voting system currently used for UK general elections, where the candidate with the most votes in a constituency wins a seat in Parliament. Proportional Representation (PR) refers to electoral systems where the distribution of seats corresponds more closely with the proportion of the total votes cast for each party. Proponents argue that PR is fairer, as it ensures every vote counts and leads to a Parliament that better represents the diverse views of the country. Opponents argue that FPTP is superior because it is simple to understand, maintains a strong link between MPs and their local constituencies, and typically produces strong, stable governments rather than unstable coalitions.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should politicians over 75 years of age have required to pass a mental competency test?

Countries that have mandatory retirements for politicians include Argentina (age 75), Brazil (75 for judges and prosecutors), Mexico (70 for judges and prosecutors) and Singapore (75 for members of parliament.)

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should a photo ID be required to vote?

Since 2011, twelve states have passed laws that require a photo identification to vote. Supporters argue that ID’s are needed to increase confidence in elections and prevent voter fraud. Critics argue that voter fraud rarely exists and that ID requirements are intended to suppress turnout by economically disadvantaged voters.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the national government have the power to override local councils to approve major infrastructure projects?

The UK's intricate planning permission system has become a massive political battleground, with critics arguing it takes too long and costs too much to build anything, from housing to high-speed rail to clean energy. Proponents of overriding local councils argue that "NIMBYism" (Not In My Back Yard) is artificially stunting the country's economic growth and crippling the urgent transition to renewable energy. Opponents argue that stripping local councils of their planning powers is a deeply undemocratic overreach by Westminster that will result in the bulldozing of the British countryside and ignoring the valid concerns of local residents.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should gay couples have the same adoption rights as straight couples?

LGBT adoption is the adoption of children by lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) persons. Same-sex couples in the United Kingdom (not including Scotland) have had the right to adopt since 2002, following the Adoption and Children Act 2002.The previous condition that the couple be married was dropped, thus allowing a same-sex couple to apply. Opponents of LGBT adoption question whether same-sex couples have the ability to be adequate parents while other opponents question whether natural law implies that children of adoption possess a natural right to be raised by heterosexual parents. Since constitutions and statutes usually fail to address the adoption rights of LGBT persons, judicial decisions often determine whether they can serve as parents either individually or as couples.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government make it a criminal offence for parents to smack or physically discipline their children?

In the UK, Scotland and Wales have fully banned the physical punishment of children, removing the 'reasonable punishment' legal defense. However, in England and Northern Ireland, parents can still legally use a light smack as long as it does not leave a mark. Proponents argue that physical discipline causes long-term psychological harm, teaches children that violence is acceptable, and that children deserve the exact same legal protection from physical assault as adults. Opponents argue that a light tap is harmless and effective, fearing a blanket ban represents state overreach that will criminalize well-meaning parents and waste valuable police resources on functional families.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Do you support the death penalty?

The death penalty or capital punishment is the punishment by death for a crime. Currently 58 countries worldwide allow the death penalty (including the U.S.) while 97 countries have outlawed it. The Murder (Abolition of Death Penalty) Act 1965 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It abolished the death penalty for murder in Great Britain (the death penalty for murder survived in Northern Ireland until 1973). The act replaced the penalty of death with a mandatory sentence of imprisonment for life.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Do you support the legalisation of same sex marriage?

The Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom which introduced same-sex marriage in England and Wales. The Act enables same sex couples to marry in civil ceremonies; ensures those religious organizations which wish to do so can opt in to marry; protects religious organisations and their representatives from successful legal, challenge if they do not wish to marry same sex couples; enables civil partners to convert their partnership to a marriage and enables individuals to change their legal gender without having to end their marriage.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should people under the age of 18 years old be able to receive gender-transition treatments?

In November 2020 three high court judges ruled that children aged under 16 will need court approval in England and Wales to access puberty blockers. In September 2021 the ruling was overturned when the Tavistock and Portman NHS foundation trust, which runs NHS England’s only gender identity development service (GIDS) for children, successfully challenged the case. In July 2022 the NHS announced it was shutting down its gender identity clinic for young people because it has been “rushing children into life-altering treatment.”

Learn more Stats Discuss

What is your stance on abortion?

Abortion is a medical procedure resulting in the termination of a human pregnancy and death of a fetus. In the UK abortion is legal in the first 6 months of pregnancy as long as the procedure is carried out in a hospital and women have the approval of two doctors. Abortion is currently illegal in Northern Ireland.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should schools be allowed to require mandatory diversity training for teachers and faculty?

Diversity training is any program designed to facilitate positive intergroup interaction, reduce prejudice and discrimination, and generally teach individuals who are different from others how to work together effectively. On April 22, 2022, Florida Governor DeSantis signed into law the “Individual Freedom Act.” The bill prohibited schools and companies from mandating diversity training as a requirement for attendance or employment. If schools or employers violated the law they would be exposed to expanded civil liability exposures. Banned mandatory training topics include: 1. Members of one race, color, sex, or national origin are morally superior to members of another. 2. An individual, by virtue of his or her race, color, sex, or national origin, is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously. Shortly after Governor DeSantis signed the bill, a group of individuals filed a lawsuit alleging that the law imposes unconstitutional viewpoint-based restrictions on speech in violation of their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should hate speech be protected by freedom of speech laws?

Hate speech laws in England and Wales are found in several statutes. Expressions of hatred toward someone on account of that person’s colour, race, sex, disability, nationality (including citizenship), ethnic or national origin, religion, gender reassignment, or sexual orientation is forbidden. Any communication which is threatening or abusive, and is intended to harass, alarm, or distress someone is forbidden. The penalties for hate speech include fines, imprisonment, or both. The Police and CPS have formulated a definition of hate crimes and hate incidents, with hate speech forming a subset of these. Something is a hate incident if the victim or anyone else think it was motivated by hostility or prejudice based on: disability, race, religion, gender identity or sexual orientation. A hate incident becomes a hate crime if it crosses the boundary of criminality.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should companies be allowed to require mandatory diversity training for employees?

Diversity training is any program designed to facilitate positive intergroup interaction, reduce prejudice and discrimination, and generally teach individuals who are different from others how to work together effectively. On April 22, 2022, Florida Governor DeSantis signed into law the “Individual Freedom Act.” The bill prohibited schools and companies from mandating diversity training as a requirement for attendance or employment. If schools or employers violated the law they would be exposed to expanded civil liability exposures. Banned mandatory training topics include: 1. Members of one race, color, sex, or national origin are morally superior to members of another. 2. An individual, by virtue of his or her race, color, sex, or national origin, is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously. Shortly after Governor DeSantis signed the bill, a group of individuals filed a lawsuit alleging that the law imposes unconstitutional viewpoint-based restrictions on speech in violation of their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should transgender athletes be allowed to compete against athletes that differ from their assigned sex at birth?

In 2016 the International Olympic committee ruled that transgender athletes can compete in the Olympics without undergoing sex reassignment surgery. In 2018 the International Association of Athletics Federations, track’s governing body, ruled that women who have more than 5 nano-mols per liter of testosterone in their blood—like South African sprinter and Olympic gold medalist Caster Semenya—must either compete against men, or take medication to reduce their natural testosterone levels. The IAAF stated that women in the five-plus category have a “difference of sexual development.” The ruling cited a 2017 study by French researchers as proof that female athletes with testosterone closer to men do better in certain events: 400 meters, 800 meters, 1,500 meters, and the mile. "Our evidence and data show that testosterone, either naturally produced or artificially inserted into the body, provides significant performance advantages in female athletes," said IAAF President Sebastian Coe in a statement.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should schools be allowed to require mandatory diversity training for students?

Diversity training is any program designed to facilitate positive intergroup interaction, reduce prejudice and discrimination, and generally teach individuals who are different from others how to work together effectively. On April 22, 2022, Florida Governor DeSantis signed into law the “Individual Freedom Act.” The bill prohibited schools and companies from mandating diversity training as a requirement for attendance or employment. If schools or employers violated the law they would be exposed to expanded civil liability exposures. Banned mandatory training topics include: 1. Members of one race, color, sex, or national origin are morally superior to members of another. 2. An individual, by virtue of his or her race, color, sex, or national origin, is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously. Shortly after Governor DeSantis signed the bill, a group of individuals filed a lawsuit alleging that the law imposes unconstitutional viewpoint-based restrictions on speech in violation of their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should women be allowed to wear a Niqāb, or face veil, to civic ceremonies?

Several Western countries including France, Spain and Canada have proposed laws which would ban Muslim women from wearing a Niqab in public spaces. A niqab is a cloth that covers the face and is worn by some Muslim women in public areas. In January 2016 David Cameron proposed banning Muslim women from wearing veils in schools, courts and other British institutions. Proponents argue that the ban infringes on individual rights and prevents people from expressing their religious beliefs. Opponents argue that face-coverings prevent the clear identification of a person, which is both a security risk, and a social hindrance within a society which relies on facial recognition and expression in communication.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should businesses be required to have women on their board of directors?

In December 2014, the German government announced a new rule which would require German companies to fill 30% of their board seats with women. In 2016 women in the U.K. hold fewer less than 22.8 percent of board jobs which is a 10% increase from 2011. This is higher than Canada (20.8%) and less than Australia (23.6%). In Norway 35.5% of boards contain women directors which is the highest percentage in the world. In 2022 the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority announced that women should make up at least 40% of boards at British listed companies and one director should be a person of colour.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should terminally ill patients be allowed to end their lives via assisted suicide?

Currently, assisted suicide (Euthanasia) is illegal in all countries of the United Kingdom. However, as a devolved matter to the Scottish parliament, it is possible that at some point in the future different laws on euthanasia could apply within the UK.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should parents lose custody for intentionally misgendering their child?

Misgendering refers to addressing or referring to someone using pronouns or gender terms that don't align with their gender identity. In some debates, particularly around transgender youth, questions have arisen about whether consistent misgendering by parents should be considered a form of emotional abuse and grounds for loss of custody. Proponents argue that persistent misgendering can cause significant psychological harm to transgender children, and in severe cases, may justify state intervention to protect the child’s well-being. Opponents argue that removing custody over misgendering infringes on parental rights, may criminalize disagreement or confusion over gender identity, and could lead to overreach by the state into family matters.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should major public events include land acknowledgment statements?

Land acknowledgments have become increasingly common nationwide over the past few years. Many mainstream public events — from soccer games and performing arts productions to city council meetings and corporate conferences — begin with these formal statements recognizing Indigenous communities' rights to territories seized by colonial powers. The 2024 Democratic National Convention began with an introduction reminding delegates how the convention is being held on land that was "forcibly removed" from Indigenous tribes. Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation Tribal Council Vice-Chairman Zach Pahmahmie and Tribal Council Secretary Lorrie Melchior took to the stage at the start of the convention where they welcomed the Democratic Party to their "ancestral homelands."

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should frozen embryos be considered children?

An embryo is an initial stage of development of a multicellular organism. In humans, embryonic development is the part of the life cycle that begins just after fertilization of the female egg cell by the male sperm cell. In vitro fertilization (IVF) is a process of fertilization where an egg is combined with sperm in vitro ("in glass").  In February 2024 the Supreme Court in the U.S. state of Alabama ruled that frozen embryos can be considered children under the state’s Wrongful Death of a Minor Act. The 1872 law allowed parents to recover punitive damages in the event of a child’s death. The Supreme Court case was brought by several couples whose embryos were destroyed when a patient dropped them on the floor in a fertility clinic’s cold-storage section. The court ruled that nothing in the law’s language stops it from being applied to frozen embryos. A dissenting judge on the court wrote that the ruling would force IVF providers in Alabama to stop freezing embryos. After the ruling several major health systems in Alabama suspended all IVF treatments. Proponents of the ruling include ant-abortion advocates who argue that embryos in test tubes should be considered children. Opponents include abortion rights advocates who argue that the ruling is based on Christian religious beliefs and is an assault on women’s rights.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should it be illegal to protest or hold vigils directly outside of abortion clinics?

In recent years, activists have increasingly gathered outside clinics to pray, hand out leaflets, or protest, sparking a fierce debate over balancing the right to protest with a patient's right to access medical care without intimidation. Parliament recently passed legislation introducing 150-metre safe access zones around clinics in England and Wales, criminalising attempts to influence or obstruct anyone accessing these services. Proponents support buffer zones because they believe patients deserve privacy, safety, and emotional protection from harassment when seeking legal healthcare. Opponents oppose buffer zones because they argue it sets a dangerous precedent for criminalising peaceful protests, silent prayer, and the freedom of expression on public streets.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should police departments be allowed to use military grade equipment?

Most British police officers (except in Northern Ireland) are not routinely armed. Instead, they rely on specially trained Authorised Firearms Officers (AFO) to attend incidents where firearms are necessary. Specialist Firearms Officers are usually trained to a higher standard than AFOs, because they are likely to be required to enter besieged premises. The vast majority of firearms used by British police are semi-automatic. The most common firearms employed by British armed units are the Glock 17 9mm pistol, the Heckler and Koch (H&K) MP5SF 9mm (single fire) carbine and the H&K G36C (single fire) 5.56mm carbine. Walther P99 - carried by Nottinghamshire Police AFOs.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government implement restorative justice programs as an alternative to incarceration?

Restorative justice programs focus on rehabilitating offenders through reconciliation with victims and the community, rather than through traditional incarceration. These programs often involve dialogue, restitution, and community service. Proponents argue that restorative justice reduces recidivism, heals communities, and provides more meaningful accountability for offenders. Opponents argue that it may not be suitable for all crimes, could be perceived as too lenient, and may not adequately deter future criminal behavior.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should drug traffickers receive the death penalty?

The Murder (Abolition of Death Penalty) Act 1965 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It abolished the death penalty for murder in Great Britain (the death penalty for murder survived in Northern Ireland until 1973). The act replaced the penalty of death with a mandatory sentence of imprisonment for life. In the U.K. citizens may be charged with possessing an illegal substance if they are caught with drugs, whether they’re yours or not. If someone is under 18, the police are allowed to tell your parent, guardian or carer that you’ve been caught with drugs. Your penalty will depend on the class and quantity of drug.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the penalty for traffic violations depend on the driver’s income?

In some countries, traffic fines are adjusted based on the offender’s income - a system known as "day fines" - to ensure that penalties are equally impactful regardless of wealth. This approach aims to create fairness by making fines proportionate to the driver’s ability to pay, rather than applying the same flat rate to everyone. Proponents argue that income-based fines make penalties more equitable, as flat fines may be insignificant to the wealthy but burdensome to low-income individuals. Opponents argue that penalties should be consistent for all drivers to maintain fairness under the law, and that income-based fines could create resentment or be difficult to enforce.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should non-violent prisoners be released from jail in order to reduce overcrowding?

Public Health England urged the Government in April 2020 to reduce it by 15,000 prisoners. Healthcare officials advised that an end to sharing cells was the most effective protection against the virus. Within six months of the warning, however, there were only 4,005 fewer people in prison, falling more than 10,000 short of the recommended reduction. Experts have expressed concerns about the future of prisons in England and Wales. Overcrowding in cells has been linked to an increase in poor mental health as thousands of prisoners must eat, sleep and use the toilet in one shared space. Overcrowding has also been linked to increased rates of violence, suicide and self-harm.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should convicted criminals have the right to vote?

Felony disenfranchisement is the exclusion from voting of people otherwise eligible to vote due to conviction of a criminal offense, usually restricted to the more serious class of crimes deemed felonies. Prisoners cannot vote while in jail in India but can vote when they are released (even if they are convicted of a felony.)

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should funding for local police departments be redirected to social and community based programs?

“Defund the police” is a slogan that supports divesting funds from police departments and reallocating them to non-policing forms of public safety and community support, such as social services, youth services, housing, education, healthcare and other community resources.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the police have expanded powers to stop and search individuals without reasonable suspicion in order to combat knife crime?

"Section 60" of the UK's Criminal Justice and Public Order Act allows police to stop and search people without reasonable suspicion in a specific area if they believe serious violence will occur. Proponents argue that broadening these powers is a necessary, proactive tool to confiscate hidden weapons and deter gang-related knife crime before tragedies happen. Opponents argue that suspicion-less searches are an authoritarian overreach that mathematically targets young ethnic minority men, alienating the very communities the police need to cooperate with. Proponents support this as a life-saving deterrent against urban violence. Opponents oppose this as a systemic civil rights violation that breeds societal resentment.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should all local police officers be routinely armed with firearms?

Most UK police officers are unarmed, relying on a philosophy of policing by consent where authority flows from public support rather than the threat of lethal force. Proponents of arming the police argue that rising knife crime, terrorist threats, and delayed response times from specialized Armed Response Vehicles leave frontline officers dangerously vulnerable. Opponents fear that routinely arming officers would fundamentally fracture community trust, increase the likelihood of fatal police shootings, and spark an arms race with criminals.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the police be required to investigate every incident of shoplifting, regardless of the stolen value?

The UK is experiencing an 'epidemic' of high street retail crime, with shoplifting incidents reaching record highs. Due to budget cuts and resource prioritization, police forces frequently screen out or fail to attend reports of shoplifting if the stolen goods are under a certain value (often £200). Retailers complain that this de facto decriminalization has emboldened organized gangs and aggressive thieves who calculate they will face no consequences. Proponents of mandatory investigation argue that broken-windows policing is essential to maintain order, protect shop workers from violence, and prevent high streets from collapsing. Opponents argue that forcing underfunded police to chase minor thefts would dangerously divert crucial resources away from investigating major crimes, or unfairly penalize the desperately poor.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should AI be used to make decisions in criminal justice systems?

This considers the use of AI algorithms to assist in making decisions such as sentencing, parole, and law enforcement. Proponents argue that it can improve efficiency and reduce human biases. Opponents argue that it may perpetuate existing biases and lacks accountability.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government hire private companies to run prisons?

Since the early 1990s, British Governments have issued contracts to private firms for both the construction and the day-to-day running of prisons. The privatization of some prison services was pursued to cope with the problems of overcrowding in the UK’s prisons and to spread the costs of interning offenders. There are currently 14 private prisons in the U.K. who house around 15% of the prison population. Opponents argue that the concept of prison care is antithetical to the notion of commercial business and that it is morally inappropriate to profit from the punishment of offenders. Proponents argue that private prisons are are incentivised to operate more efficiently and can bring benefits to U.K. taxpayer.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the UK abolish university tuition fees?

Tuition fees in the U.K. were first imposed in 1998 and required students to pay up to £1,000 a year for tuition. England increased the fees to £3,000 a year in 2004 and in 2012 64 universities announced their intention to charge the full £9,000 allowed by the government, with the remaining 59 all charging at least £6,000. Scotland currently does not charge any tuition fees. Northern Ireland, Wales and Ireland currently impose a cap on their tuition fees of £3,000 a year.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Would you support the return of a selective education system and the reintroduction of grammar schools?

In 2017 Theresa May announced a £320m program to build a new generation of grammar schools. The plan would also will also pay for free transport for children from poorer families to attend selective schools within 15 miles of where they live. Opponents of the plan, including Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, claim it will take away funds from public schools.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should critical race theory be taught in primary and secondary school?

Critical race theory is the claim that institutions, laws, and history are inherently racist. It argues that white people have put up social, economic, and legal barriers between the races in order to maintain their elite status, both economically and politically and that the source of poverty and criminal behavior in minority communities is due exclusively to these barriers.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should free meals be offered to all primary school students?

In 2022 1.9 million children in the UK were eligible for free school meals. In order to for free meals a student’s family must earn less than £7,400 a year. An independent report estimated that the income threshold needed to be raised so an additional 1 million children can receive free meals.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should every student be required to take a GCSE exam at the end of Year Eleven?

GCSE exams are taken by pupils at the end of school year 11 in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. The exams are a uniform framework for academic performance, with students given grades ranging from “A to G.” Scotland has an independent system in which three different levels of exams are given to different age groups. Proponents argue that the GCSE encourages students to work hard in school and provides clarity for college admissions and employers. Opponents argue that standard end-of-year exams will encourage a narrow academic focus, over-regulate teachers and discourage instruction of the arts.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government decriminalize school truancy?

Truancy is intentional, unjustified, unauthorized, or illegal absence from compulsory education. Its absence is caused by students of their own free will and does not apply to excused absences. In England and Wales truancy is a criminal offence. Parents of students who are persistently truant may be imprisoned for up to 3 months.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Do you support charter schools?

Charter schools are tax payer funded K-12 schools that are managed by private companies. Grant-maintained schools were established in the UK and Wales in 1988. These schools were independent of the local school authority until they were turned into foundation schools in 1998. Since 1998 200 Academies have opened which are publicly funded schools with a significant degree of autonomy.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should universities be held financially accountable if graduates, with degrees leading to lower income jobs, default on their student loans?

Stats Discuss

Should schools be required to inform parents if their child questions their gender identity?

This issue centers on the delicate balance between parental rights and child privacy within the UK education system. Supporters of mandatory notification argue that parents are the primary caregivers and must be involved in significant decisions regarding their child's health and development to provide adequate support. Opponents argue that such a requirement effectively 'outs' children without their consent, which could lead to homelessness or abuse in unsupportive households, and that schools should prioritize the immediate psychological safety of the student.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should students be allowed to use AI to complete their homework?

The rapid rise of generative AI tools like ChatGPT has sparked a fierce debate in the educational sector about academic integrity versus technological adaptation. Supporters argue that schools must evolve to teach students how to work alongside AI, as it will likely be a standard tool in the future workforce. Critics contend that unrestricted access to AI allows students to bypass the cognitive struggle necessary for learning, producing graduates who cannot write or think independently. Proponents support integration to modernize the curriculum, while opponents support bans to preserve the fundamental development of human intellect.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should private schools lose their tax exemptions and be charged VAT on tuition fees?

The UK Labour Party has pledged to remove the tax-exempt status of private schools, which would subject school fees to a standard 20% VAT rate. The policy aims to raise an estimated £1.5 billion to fund 6,500 new teachers for the state sector and improve mental health support. Proponents argue this ends an unfair subsidy for the wealthy and redistributes resources to the 93% of children in state education. Opponents warn that the price hike will force middle-class families out of private education, overwhelming local state schools and potentially costing the taxpayer more than the tax generates.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should all state schools be required to follow a standard curriculum?

In 1988 the federal government passed the Education Reform Act which required students at all state schools to be taught a standard curriculum. The curriculum is intended to “promote pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development and prepare all pupils for the opportunities, responsibilities and experiences of life.” Proponents believe that this is necessary to keep standards high at all schools funded by the government. Opponents believe that teachers should be able to develop curriculum content that is best suited for their students.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government allow businesses, charities, parents or teachers to use public money to start "free schools"?

A free school is classified as a non-profit making, independent, state-funded school which is free to attend but which is not controlled by a Local Authority. They are subject to the same School Admissions Code as all of State-funded schools. The Department of Education must approve all free schools and they are expected to comply with standard performance measures. Supporters argue that they create healthy competition for public schools and increase standards. Opponents argue that the schools will divert money away from existing schools and only benefit middle-class students whose parents have the resources to start them.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the European Commission be dismantled?

The European Commission is the executive branch of the EU and is responsible for proposing legislation and enforcing treaties. Each member of the EU appoints an official to the 28 members of the commission.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Do you agree with the UK’s Brexit decision to withdraw from the European Union?

On June 23rd 2016 UK voters approved the EU membership referendum 51.89% - 48.11%. The referendum resulted in a vote for the EU to leave the UK. A majority of voters in the England and Wales voted to leave while a majority of voters in Scotland and Northern Ireland voted to stay. Proponents of the exit argued that EU membership undermined the UK's sovereignty and leaving would help the UK control immigration. Opponents of the exit argue that leaving the EU would damage trade, cause unemployment and harm foreign investment.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the UK abolish the Human Rights Act?

The Human Rights Act of 1998 is an Act of Parliament which aims to give further effect to the rights and freedoms guaranteed under the European Convention on Human Rights.&nbsp;&nbsp;<a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Rights_Act_1998">Learn&nbsp;more</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;or

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the UK renew its Trident nuclear weapons programme?

The UK Trident programme encompasses is a nuclear weapons system consisting of four Vanguard-class submarines armed with Trident II D-5 ballistic missiles, able to deliver thermonuclear warheads. It is the most expensive and most powerful capability of the British military forces.

the development, procurement and operation of the current generation of British nuclear weapons, and the means to deliver them.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the United Kingdom increase or decrease foreign aid spending?

The United Kingdom is currently ranked #2 in the total amount of foreign aid spending per year ($13.66B) and ranked #6 in foreign aid spending as a percentage of GDP (.56%).

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should Italy increase or decrease military spending?

In 2021/22, the United Kingdom spent approximately 48.6 billion British pounds on defense, an increase of around four billion pounds when on the previous year. In October 2022 British Secretary of State for Defence Ben Wallace announced that Britain’s military spending will double and reach 100 billion pounds by 2030, meeting the new Prime Minister Truss’ goal of increasing military spending to 3% of GDP.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should every 18 year old citizen be required to provide at least one year of military service?

Military Service is currently not required in the U.K.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the United Kingdom provide military supplies and funding to Ukraine?

On February 24 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine in a major escalation of the Russo-Ukrainian War that began in 2014. The invasion caused Europe's largest refugee crisis since World War II, with around 7.1 million Ukrainians fleeing the country and a third of the population displaced. It has also caused global food shortages.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the EU sanction member countries with authoritarian governments?

In 2019 Hungary elected Viktor Orban’s government and became the first EU country to be downgraded by the Freedom House organization to a “partly free” country. The organization labeled it a hybrid authoritarian regime that maintains formal democratic institutions but fails to meet the minimal standards for democracy.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should Ukraine join NATO?

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization an intergovernmental military alliance between 30 member states – 28 European and two North American. After Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, the Ukrainian government repeatedly requested to be accepted into NATO as a member country. Ukraine’s NATO membership has long been a thorny subject in amongst U.S. government officials due to Article 5 of the alliance’s charter. Article 5 requires the U.S. to militarily defend any member-nation that comes under attack. NATO members countries fear that Ukraine’s immediate entry into NATO — which requires the unanimous approval of all 30 member-nations — would put the U.S. and Russia at war due to Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine as well as its forced annexations announced in September 2022.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government support financial reparations for the historical legacy of slavery?

The debate over slavery reparations questions whether modern governments should provide financial compensation for the trans-Atlantic slave trade and its lasting economic impacts. Proponents, including groups like CARICOM, argue that Western industrial wealth was built on stolen labor, creating a generational wealth gap that requires restorative justice and debt cancellation to fix. Opponents argue that liability for historical wrongs does not transfer to current taxpayers who never owned slaves, and that resources are better spent on forward-looking economic policies rather than litigating the distant past.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Do you support a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?

The two-state solution is a proposed diplomatic solution for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The proposal envisions an independent State of Palestine that borders Israel. Palestinian leadership has supported the concept since the 1982 Arab Summit in Fez. In 2017 the Hamas (a Palestinian Resistance movement that controls the Gaza strip) accepted the solution without recognizing Israel as a state. The current Israeli leadership has stated that a two-state solution can only exist without Hamas and the current Palestinian leadership. The U.S. would have to take a central role in any talks between the Israelis and Palestinians. That has not happened since the Obama administration, when the secretary of state at the time, John Kerry, shuttled between the two sides in 2013 and 2014 before giving up in frustration. Under President Donald J. Trump, the United States shifted its energy from resolving the Palestinian issue to normalizing relations between Israel and its Arab neighbors. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has swung between saying he would be willing to consider a Palestinian nation with limited security powers, and opposing it outright. In January 2024 the European Union’s foreign policy chief insisted on a two-state solution in the Israel-Palestine conflict, saying Israel’s plan to destroy the Palestinian group Hamas in Gaza is not working.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the EU evolve into the United States of Europe?

The United States of Europe is a proposed scenario where members of the European Union would transition into a single sovereign country. Each EU country would acquire a status similar to U.S. states.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the military use weapons guided by artificial intelligence?

Artificial intelligence (AI) makes it possible for machines to learn from experience, adjust to new inputs and perform human-like tasks. Lethal autonomous weapons systems use artificial intelligence to identify and kill human targets without human intervention. Russia, the United States and China have all recently invested billions of dollars secretly developing AI weapons systems sparking fears of an eventual “AI Cold War.”In April 2024 +972 Magazine published a report detailing the Israeli Defense Forces intelligence-based program known as “Lavender.” Israeli intelligence sources told the magazine that Lavender played a central role in the bombing of Palestinians during the Gaza War. The system was designed to mark all suspected Palestinian military operatives as potential bombing targets. The Israeli army systematically attacked the targeted individuals while they were in their homes — usually at night while their whole families were present — rather than during the course of military activity. The result, as the sources testified, is that thousands of Palestinians — most of them women and children or people who were not involved in the fighting — were wiped out by Israeli airstrikes, especially during the first weeks of the war, because of the AI program’s decisions.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should intelligence agencies be merged to create a central EU agency?

In. November 2017 French President Emmauel Marcon proposed creating a central European intelligence agency. The proposal would pool each member country’s intelligence services into a single agency which would help combat terrorism.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the U.K. defend other NATO countries that maintain low military defense budgets relative to their GDP?

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is an intergovernmental military alliance formed by 28 countries in 1949 after the Second World War. To join NATO each member country pledged to spend at least 2% of their GDP on military spending and defense and defend each other against threats from any non-member country. In a July 2016 interview with the New York Times Republican Presidential nominee Donald Trump suggested that the United States would not defend NATO member countries who had failed to increase their military budgets to above 2% of Gross Domestic Product. The suggestion defies a pact made by NATO members when it was formed in WWII that they would defend each other against any attack by a non-member nation. France, Turkey, Germany, Canada, and Italy are countries that are currently spending less than 2% of their GDP on military defense.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the UK return the Parthenon Sculptures (Elgin Marbles) to Greece?

The Parthenon Sculptures, also known as the Elgin Marbles, were removed from Athens in the early 19th century by Lord Elgin and are currently held in the British Museum. Proponents of repatriation argue that the sculptures are an integral part of Greek cultural heritage and were taken unlawfully during Ottoman occupation. Opponents argue that the British Museum is a universal institution where they can be seen by a global audience, and that returning them sets a dangerous precedent for other museum collections.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the UK seek to rejoin the European Single Market?

The European Single Market allows the free movement of goods, services, capital and people between EU member states. The UK left the Single Market following Brexit and now trades under a separate agreement. Rejoining would require accepting certain EU rules and oversight. Proponents argue that Single Market access would reduce trade barriers and support economic growth. Opponents argue it would limit regulatory independence and constrain the UK’s ability to strike global trade deals.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the EU impose a quota of migrants per country?

In 2015 the European Commission proposed a plan that called for for allocating asylum seekers across the EU, based on each country’s gross domestic product, unemployment rate, total population and the number of refugees already taken in by each country. The British government opposed the quotas and insisted that migrants who didn’t qualify for asylum should be sent back. “It’s important that people picked up in the Mediterranean can be taken back to Africa,” U.K. Home Secretary Theresa May told Sky News.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government send illegal asylum seekers to Rwanda?

The Rwanda Asylum Plan was proposed by the UK government in April 2022. The plan would relocate illegal immigrants and asylum seekers to Rwanda for asylum and resettlement. The migrants would be flown to Rwanda where they would apply for asylum. Once in Rwanda migrants would not be allowed to enter the UK.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government enact a stricter immigration policy?

In 2021 there were approximately 6.0 million people with non-British nationality living in the UK and 9.6 million people who were born abroad. The UK’s migrant population is concentrated in London. Around 35% of people living in the UK who were born abroad live in London.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should immigrants from high risk countries be banned from entering the country until the government improves its ability to screen out potential terrorists?

Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry. Critics argue that such a policy might inadvertently promote discrimination by broadly categorizing individuals based on their nation of origin rather than specific, credible threat intelligence. It may strain diplomatic relations with the affected countries and potentially harm the perception of the nation enacting the ban, being seen as hostile or prejudiced towards certain international communities. Additionally, genuine refugees fleeing terrorism or persecution in their home countries might be unjustly denied safe haven.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the UK increase or decrease the amount of temporary work visas given to high-skilled immigrant workers?

Between 2008 and 2010 the United Kingdom began implementing a five tiered “points-based immigration system” which separated immigrant applicants into five tiers based on their employment potential. To secure a skilled worker visa, people have to qualify for 70 points. Having a job offer from an approved employer for a skilled job and being able to speak English will give 50 points. The applicant can achieve the remaining 20 points if they are due to be paid at least £25,600 a year. They can also gain extra points for having better qualifications (10 points for a relevant PhD, or 20 points for a PhD in science, technology, engineering or maths) or an offer of a job in which the UK has a shortage (20 points), even if it doesn’t pay as much money. Certain jobs in health or education still merit 20 points even if the salary is less than £25,600. The applicant must be paid at least £20,480, and in line with set amounts for particular jobs in the UK’s four nations. The exception to this is Irish citizens, who are still able to live and work in the UK as part of the Common Travel Area.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the children of migrants who live in French territories be allowed to join their families?

The Calais Jungle was a refugee and illegal migrant encampment in the vicinity of Calais, France that existed from January 2015 to October 2016. 3000 migrants stayed at the camp while they attempted to enter the United Kingdom, or while they waited for their French asylum claims to be processed. French authorities cleared the Calais camp in October 2016 and another camp in Dunkirk in September 2019. Aid groups later reported that many former jungle residents had moved to the streets of Paris.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should immigrants be required to pass a citizenship test to demonstrate a basic understanding of our country’s language, history, and government?

Since 2002 People seeking to apply for citizenship within the UK must pass the Life in the United Kingdom test. The test contains 24 questions and covers topics including British values, history, traditions and everyday life. To pass each candidate must receive answer 18 of the 24 questions correctly. 70% of candidates currently pass the test.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government increase temporary housing to accommodate immigrants and refugees?

Temporary housing refers to short-term accommodations provided for those without permanent residence, in this case to support immigrants and refugees as they settle in a new country. Proponents argue that increasing temporary housing offers humane and stable support for newcomers, easing their transition and helping communities manage arrivals. Opponents argue that expanding temporary housing may strain public resources, affect local housing markets, and that other solutions may be more sustainable.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government impose annual caps on work and family visas?

In May 2024  British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak proposed capping the number of visas the government issues every year. The annual cap, which will progressively be lowered each year to cut migration numbers, will not affect foreign students and seasonal workers. More than 300,000 work visas were given in the year ending March 2024, which is more than double the number granted in 2019, according to official statistics. While the tightened regulations led to a huge decline in the number of health and social care visa applications in May, according to interior ministry figures, care providers have warned that the sector is struggling to fill tens of thousands of vacancies. Labour's shadow home minister Yvette Cooper dismissed the proposed policy as a "meaningless announcement".

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should immigrants to the United Kingdom be allowed to hold dual citizenship status?

Dual citizenship (also known as dual nationality) is allowed in the UK. This means you can be a British citizen and also a citizen of other countries. You do not need to apply for dual citizenship. You can apply for foreign citizenship and keep your British citizenship.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the UK leave the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) to enforce stricter immigration policies?

The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) is an international treaty designed to protect human rights and political freedoms in Europe. In the UK, debate has flared over whether ECHR membership prevents the government from deporting illegal asylum seekers and foreign criminals. Proponents of leaving argue that the ECHR undermines British sovereignty and prevents the swift removal of individuals who arrive illegally via small boats. Opponents argue that leaving would strip British citizens of crucial human rights protections, violate the Good Friday Agreement, and align the UK with countries like Russia and Belarus who are outside the convention.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should asylum seekers be legally permitted to work while their claims are being processed?

Under current UK law, individuals seeking asylum are generally not allowed to work while their claim is being processed, which can often take over a year. During this time, they rely on government support, including a small weekly allowance and state-provided accommodation, which costs taxpayers millions daily. Proponents argue that lifting the ban would allow asylum seekers to integrate, pay taxes, and fill critical labor shortages while restoring their dignity. Opponents argue that granting the right to work blurs the line between refugees and economic migrants, potentially encouraging more illegal crossings and taking jobs away from local workers.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the UK deport immigrants who are considered to be promoting terrorism?

Under section 15 of the Immigration Act 1971, the Home Secretary has a very broad power to deport any foreign national whose removal from the UK he or she believes would be ‘conducive to the public good’. Although the Home Secretary enjoys a very broad ground to deport foreign nationals, this power is traditionally exercised when a foreign national is engaged in criminal activity or deemed a threat to the national security of the UK.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should immigrants be expected to learn the official language of their new country?

In order to apply for British citizenship applicants must pass the Life in the UK test. Applicants have 45 minutes to answer 24 questions about British traditions and customs. The test is only given in English, Welsh or Scottish Gaelic.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government fund schools that select students based on their religious faith?

In the UK, about one-third of state-funded schools are faith schools, mostly Christian, but also Jewish, Muslim, and Sikh. While they follow the national curriculum, they can prioritise children of their faith in admissions and teach Religious Education according to their own tenets. Supporters argue this provides parental choice and often leads to better academic outcomes due to a shared ethos. Opponents argue it uses public money to segregate communities, potentially harming social cohesion and discriminating against teachers or students of no faith.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Do you support the use of hydraulic fracking to extract oil and natural gas resources?

According to estimates, England uses 1.1 billion single-use plates and 4.25 billion items of single-use cutlery — most of which are plastic — per year, but only 10% are recycled upon disposal. In April 2022 the U.K. government introduced a plastic packaging tax from April 2022, set at £200 per tonne, on plastic packaging which doesn’t meet a minimum threshold of at least 30% recycled content. In October 2022 Prime Minister Rishi Sunak banned fracking in the U.K., reversing a decision made by his predecessor Liz Truss, as the new British leader returned to a 2019 Conservative Party manifesto pledge.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should local councils enforce Ultra Low Emission Zones (ULEZ) that charge daily fees to drive older, higher-polluting vehicles?

Ultra Low Emission Zones (ULEZ) charge drivers of older, more polluting vehicles a daily fee (often £12.50) to enter designated city areas. Initially introduced in central London, the recent expansion to outer boroughs sparked fierce political blowback, vigilante attacks on 'ANPR' cameras by groups calling themselves 'Blade Runners', and a national debate over environmental policy versus economic reality. Proponents argue that bold action is scientifically necessary to prevent thousands of premature deaths linked to toxic nitrogen dioxide (NO2) air pollution. Opponents argue it is a punitive 'war on motorists' that unfairly taxes the working class who rely on older vans and cars for their daily survival.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government increase environmental regulations on businesses to reduce carbon emissions?

Global warming, or climate change, is an increase in the earth’s atmospheric temperature since the late nineteenth century. In politics, the debate over global warming is centered on whether this increase in temperature is due to greenhouse gas emissions or is the result of a natural pattern in the earth’s temperature. In 2022 the U.K. Prime Minister pledged that the UK will triple funding for climate change adaptation programmes from £500 million in 2019 to £1.5 billion in 2025.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should researchers be allowed to use animals in testing the safety of drugs, vaccines, medical devices, and cosmetics?

Animal testing is the use of non-human animals in experiments that seek to control the variables that affect the behavior or biological system under study. The United Kingdom was the first country in the world to implement laws protecting animals. In 1822 an Act to Prevent the Cruel and Improper Treatment of Cattle was passed by Parliament. The UK government has publicly stated that animals are sentient beings, not merely commodities, and has confirmed its commitment to the highest possible standards of animal welfare. Animal Welfare Act, an overhaul of pet abuse laws replacing the Protection of Animals Act, came into force in England and Wales in 2007.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should disposable products (such as plastic cups, plates, and cutlery) that contain less than 50% of biodegradable material be banned?

In 2016, France became the first country to ban the sale of plastic disposable products that contain less than 50% of biodegradable material and in 2017, India passed a law banning all plastic disposable plastic products.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government build a network of electric vehicle charging stations?

In 2022 the European Union, Canada, the U.K. and the U.S. state of California approved regulations banning the sale of new gasoline-powered cars and trucks by 2035. Plug-in hybrids, full electrics and hydrogen cell vehicles would all count toward the zero-emission targets, though auto makers will only be able to use plug-in hybrids to meet 20% of the overall requirement. The regulation will impact only new-vehicle sales and affects only manufacturers, not dealerships. Traditional internal-combustion vehicles will still be legal to own and drive after 2035, and new models can still be sold until 2035. Volkswagen and Toyota have said they aim to sell only zero-emission cars in Europe by that time.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government fund research into geoengineering as a way to combat climate change?

Geoengineering refers to the deliberate large-scale intervention in the Earth's climate system to counteract climate change, such as by reflecting sunlight, increasing precipitation, or removing CO2 from the atmosphere. Proponents argue that geoengineering could provide innovative solutions to global warming. Opponents argue that it is risky, unproven, and could have unforeseen negative consequences.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government provide subsidies to taxpayers who purchase an electric vehicle?

Joe Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) in August 2022, which allocated millions to combating climate change and other energy provisions while additionally establishing a $7,500 tax credit for electric vehicles.  To qualify for the subsidy 40% of the critical minerals used in electric-vehicle batteries must be sourced in the U.S.  EU and South Korean officials argues that the subsidies discriminated against their automotive, renewable-energy, battery and energy-intensive industries. Proponents argue that the tax credits will help combat climate change by encouraging consumers to purchase EVs and stop driving gas powered automobiles. Opponents argue that the tax credits will only hurt domestic battery and EV producers.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the "right to roam" be extended to allow public access to all woodlands, rivers, and Green Belt land?

The 'Right to Roam' campaign seeks to extend the Countryside and Rights of Way (CRoW) Act 2000 in England and Wales to cover rivers, woods, and Green Belt land, moving closer to the 'freedom to roam' model used in Scotland and Scandinavia. Currently, the public only has a right of access to about 8% of land in England, mostly restricted to mountains, moors, and coastal paths. Supporters argue that expanding access is a matter of social justice and public health, allowing more people to connect with nature. Opponents, including farmers and landowning associations, warn that a blanket right to roam would endanger biosecurity, increase dog attacks on livestock, and degrade fragile ecosystems through litter and disturbance.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government provide subsidies for companies developing carbon capture technologies?

Carbon capture technologies are methods designed to capture and store carbon dioxide emissions from sources like power plants to prevent them from entering the atmosphere. Proponents argue that subsidies would accelerate the development of essential technologies to combat climate change. Opponents argue that it is too costly and that the market should drive innovation without government intervention.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Do you support the practice of hunting foxes with dogs?

In 2004 the government passed the Hunting Act which banned the practice of hunting mammals with dogs in England and Wales. The Act allows dogs to sniff out foxes but bans them from killing. The Act does not prevent hunters from using dogs to “drag hunt" which uses dogs to track and sniff out foxes. Proponents argue that fox hunting with dogs is a time honored tradition that supports rural communities. Opponents argue that killing foxes with dogs is cruel since the hunted animals suffer severe physiological and psychological stress during the hunt - whether they are killed or not.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government ban short-haul flights where a train alternative exists?

Short-haul flights are notoriously carbon-intensive per kilometer compared to train travel, often emitting ten times more CO2 per passenger. France recently enacted a ban on flights where a 2.5-hour train alternative exists, sparking a global debate about the future of travel. Proponents argue that in a climate emergency, eliminating unnecessary high-carbon travel is a crucial step toward Net Zero. Opponents argue that bans infringe on consumer freedom, ignore the unreliability of rail networks, and stifle aviation innovation.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Do you support the use of genetically engineered crops and foods?

Genetically modified foods (or GM foods) are foods produced from organisms that have had specific changes introduced into their DNA using the methods of genetic engineering. Currently, the EU has one of the stringent regulations of GMO (Genetically Modified Organism) foods in the the world. All GMOs, along with irradiated food, are considered "new food" and are subject to extensive, case-by-case, science-based food evaluation by the European Food Safety Authority. There are currently no GM crops being grown commercially in the UK although scientists are carrying out controlled trials. In the UK, foods have to be labelled as GM if they contain genetically modified plants or animals. GM foods can only be sold if the Food Standards Agency judges that they do not present a risk to health.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should cities be allowed to offer private companies economic incentives to relocate?

In September 2022 British finance minister Kwasi Kwarteng outlined what he called an "unprecedented set of tax incentives" for businesses in newly-announced investment zones, saying the government would also liberalise planning rules for specified agreed sites. The government said there were potential investment zones in England so far but it would work with the devolved administrations in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland to deliver them around the United Kingdom. Areas interested in becoming investment zones include Liverpool and Greater Manchester in northwest England, Somerset and Plymouth in the southwest, Sunderland and the Tees Valley in the northeast and Southampton and Essex in the south and east.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the current Council Tax system be abolished and replaced with a Proportional Property Tax based on current home values?

Council Tax is the main system used to fund local government services in Britain, based on property valuations that have not been updated since 1991. A proposed Proportional Property Tax would charge homeowners a flat percentage of their property's current value, meaning bills would fall for most households in the North and Midlands but rise significantly in London and the South East. Proponents argue the 1991 bands are fundamentally unfair, allowing wealthy elites to pay proportionately less than low-income households in cheaper areas. Opponents warn it would create massive sudden tax hikes for middle-class homeowners in the South and force many elderly people on fixed incomes out of their long-time homes.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government bring water companies back into public ownership to address the sewage crisis?

Water services in England and Wales are provided by privately owned regional companies. In recent years, concerns have grown over sewage discharges, infrastructure underinvestment and shareholder dividends. Nationalisation would mean returning these companies to public ownership and state control. Proponents argue that public ownership would prioritise environmental standards and reinvest profits into infrastructure. Opponents argue that nationalisation would be costly for taxpayers and that stronger regulation is a better solution.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government invest in programs to reduce food waste?

Food waste programs aim to reduce the amount of edible food that is discarded. Proponents argue that it would improve food security and reduce environmental impact. Opponents argue that it is not a priority and that the responsibility should lie with individuals and businesses.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government ban the installation of new gas boilers to force a transition to low-carbon heat pumps?

The UK government has proposed phasing out the installation of new gas boilers by 2035 to meet its legally binding net-zero climate targets, replacing them with electric heat pumps. Proponents argue that eliminating domestic gas heating is essential to cutting carbon emissions and will eventually lower energy bills. Opponents argue that heat pumps are prohibitively expensive to install, perform poorly in poorly insulated homes, and place an unfair financial burden on working-class families.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the British Monarchy be abolished?

The British monarch is limited to non-partisan functions such as bestowing honours, appointing the Prime Minister, and by tradition is commander-in-chief of the British Armed Forces. Though the ultimate formal executive authority over the government is still through the monarch's royal prerogative, these powers may only be used according to laws enacted in Parliament and within the constraints of convention and precedent.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Are you in favour of decriminalising drug use?

In 1971 Parliament passed the Misuse of Drugs act which made the non-medical use of certain drugs illegal. The act classified the drugs into 3 penalty categories. Class A: Cocaine, crack, ecstasy, heroin, LSD, methadone, methamphetamine and magic mushrooms. Penalty: 6 Months to Life Class B: Amphetimine, barbiturates, codeine, ketamine, synthetic cannabinoids, mephedrone, methylone, methedrone and MDPV. Penalty: 3 Months to 14 Years. Class C: Anabolic steroids, benzodiazepines, GBL and GHB, khat and BZP. Penalty: 3 Months to 14 Years.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Do you support the use of zero hour contracts?

A zero hour contract is an employment agreement. It does not oblige the employer to provide work for the employee but the employee is expected to be on call and receives compensation only for hours worked. Zero hour contracts may be ideal for retirees and students who want occasional earnings and are flexible about when they work but general workers run the risk of unpredictable hours and earnings. The National Minimum Wage Regulations require that employers pay the national minimum wage for the time workers are required to be at the workplace even if there is no "work" to do.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the UK reinstate a form of mandatory national service?

National military service in the UK was abolished in 1960. Recently, parliament has proposed the idea of a new modern form of national service that would make it mandatory for 18-26 year olds to participate in military or charitable service for a period of one year.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should it be illegal to burn the UK flag?

Flag desecration is any act that is carried out with the intention of damaging or destroying a national flag in public. This is commonly done in an effort to make a political statement against a nation or its policies. Some nations have acts that ban flag desecration while others have laws that protect the right to destroy a flag as a part of free speech. Some of these laws distinguish between a national flag and those of other countries.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the House of Lords be abolished?

The House of Lords is the upper house of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. Members are appointed by either the monarch or the House of Lords Appointments Commission. The House of Lords reviews laws passed by the House of Commons and can delay their passage if deemed necessary.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government be able to monitor phone calls and emails?

In 2015 Parliament passed the Investigatory Powers Bill which consolidated UK laws governing surveillance. The bill requires telecom companies to retain users' "Internet connection records" for up to 12 months and would allow authority for intelligence and security agencies, the police, and the armed forces to hack into computers, networks, and mobile phones.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government regulate social media sites, as a means to prevent fake news and misinformation?

In January 2018 Germany passed the NetzDG law which required platforms like Facebook, Twitter and YouTube to take down perceived illegal content within 24 hours or seven days, depending on the charge, or risk a fine of €50 million ($60 million) fines. In July 2018 representatives from Facebook, Google and Twitter denied to the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary committee that they censor content for political reasons. During the hearing Republican members of Congress criticized the social media companies for politically motivated practices in removing some content, a charge the companies rejected. In April 2018 the European Union issued a series of proposals that would crack down on “online misinformation and fake news.” In June 2018 President Emmanuel Macron of France proposed a law which would give French authorities the power to immediately halt “the publication of information deemed to be false ahead of elections.”

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the House of Lords be a wholly elected body?

The House of Lords is a historically powerful body whose members traditionally consisted of hundreds of hereditary peers, whose titles passed from generation to generation. In 2014 Parliament passed the House of Lords Reform Act which allowed members to resign, be disqualified for non-attendance or be removed for receiving prison sentences of one year or more. Recent proposals to reform the house include making 240 of the 300 members elected by the public.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should Welsh, Scottish, and Northern Irish MPs be entitled to vote on legislation which only affects England?

The issue of English votes for English laws (EVEL), commonly known as the West Lothian question, refers to whether MPs from Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland should be able to vote on matters that affect only England. Some argue that because of the Barnett formula, issues in England greatly affect Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. The Barnett formula automatically adjusts levels of public spending in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland based on the population of each nation and which powers are devolved to them.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should social media companies ban political advertising?

In October 2019 Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey announced that his social media company would ban all political advertising. He stated that political messages on the platform should reach users through the recommendation of other users – not through paid reach. Proponents argue that social media companies don’t have the tools to stop the spread of false information since their advertising platforms aren’t moderated by human beings. Opponents argue that the ban will disenfranchise candidates and campaigns who rely on social media for grassroots organizing and fundraising.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should nonviolent drug offenders be given mandatory jail sentences?

In 1997 the Conservative government passed a 'three strikes' policy which imposed a minimum sentence of seven years for those convicted for a third time of drug trafficking involving class A drugs. Soon after, the Labour party passed legislation that enabled Judges to reduce the sentences in cases they find to be unjust.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government ban gambling advertisements in sports and media?

The UK has one of the world's largest online gambling markets, driven by the ubiquity of smartphone betting apps and aggressive 'in-play' marketing during live sports. While a total ban mimics successful tobacco legislation, critics warn it creates a massive funding black hole for sports clubs that have become dependent on betting revenue. Proponents argue the 'gamblification' of football is grooming a new generation of addicts; opponents argue it is a harmless vice for the vast majority of adults that shouldn't be policed.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the Welsh assembly be granted more devolved power from Parliament to create regional laws?

The National Assembly for Wales is the devolved parliament of Wales. Devolution is the delegation of powers from a central government of a sovereign state to govern at a regional level. Currently the Assembly has the powers to set university tuition rates and charges for residential nursing care.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should there be term limits set for Members of Parliament?

A term limit is a law which limits the length of time a person may serve in an elected office. In the UK the Prime Minister and Members of Parliament must be re-elected every five years. The Lord Speaker is elected for a period of five years, and can serve no more than two terms.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government ban gambling advertisements?

The UK has one of the world's largest online gambling markets, driven by the ubiquity of smartphone betting apps and aggressive 'in-play' marketing during live sports. While a total ban mimics successful tobacco legislation, critics warn it creates a massive funding black hole for sports clubs that have become dependent on betting revenue. Proponents argue the 'gamblification' of football is grooming a new generation of addicts; opponents argue it is a harmless vice for the vast majority of adults that shouldn't be policed.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government ban the sale of smartphones to children under the age of 16?

This movement, often called 'Smartphone Free Childhood', argues that the rise in youth anxiety and cyberbullying correlates directly with the release of the first smartphone. Proponents believe government intervention is necessary because individual parents cannot fight the addictive algorithms of trillion-dollar tech companies alone. Opponents argue that a ban is unenforceable, disconnects children from their peers, and that digital literacy is a crucial skill that should be taught rather than prohibited.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should England establish a devolved Parliament?

Currently, representatives of English voters do not have separate decision-making powers (also known as a Devolved English Parliament) similar to the representation given by the National Assembly for Wales, Scottish Parliament and the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government implement rent control policies to limit the amount landlords can charge for rent?

Rent control policies are regulations that limit the amount landlords can increase rent, intended to keep housing affordable. Proponents argue that it makes housing more affordable and prevents exploitation by landlords. Opponents argue that it discourages investment in rental properties and reduces the quality and availability of housing.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government shift from private rentals to public housing to improve affordability?

Reducing reliance on the private rental market means shifting towards alternative housing solutions, such as public or subsidized housing, to address rising rent prices and improve affordability. Proponents argue that it would make housing more accessible and affordable, lessen market volatility, and provide stable options for low- and middle-income families. Opponents argue that reducing reliance on the private market could discourage private investment, reduce housing supply, and that government intervention may be costly and inefficient.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should homeless individuals, that have refused available shelter or housing, be allowed to sleep or encamp on public property?

The Homelessness Reduction Act 2017 is to ensure that everyone who is at risk of homelessness, or who is homeless, is legally entitled to meaningful help from their local authority regardless of their current status. It does this by defining the service that local councils and other public bodies must provide to those who are homeless or at risk of becoming homeless. The law requires councils to provide that help at an earlier stage than previously, with the objective that this will decrease the likelihood that people will become homeless.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the leasehold system for houses and flats be abolished and replaced with commonhold?

Under the leasehold system, homeowners own their property for a fixed term while the land remains owned by a freeholder, often requiring ground rent and service charges. Commonhold would grant flat owners collective ownership of the building and shared areas without time limits. Proponents argue reform would give homeowners greater control and fairness. Opponents argue that the existing system provides legal clarity and stability for managing large buildings.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government incentivize the construction of high density residential buildings?

High density housing refers to housing developments with a higher population density than average. For example, high rise apartments are considered high density, especially in comparison to single-family homes or condominiums. High density real estate can also be developed from empty or abandoned buildings. For instance, old warehouses can be renovated and turned into luxury lofts. Further, commercial buildings that are no longer in use can be refitted into high-rise apartments. Opponents argue that more housing will lower the value of their home (or rental units) and change the “character” of neighborhoods. Proponents argue that the buildings are more environmentally friendly than single family homes will lower housing costs for people who cannot afford large homes.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the national government force local councils to meet mandatory housing construction targets?

In the UK, the debate between 'YIMBY' (Yes In My Backyard) and 'NIMBY' (Not In My Backyard) factions heavily dominates housing politics. Decades of missed housing targets have led to skyrocketing property prices and a severe shortage of affordable homes. To fix this, some national politicians want to strip local councils of their veto power and enforce top-down, mandatory building targets. Proponents argue that aggressive state intervention is the only empirical way to break through local obstructionism and build the millions of homes desperately needed by young people. Opponents argue this overreach crushes local democracy, overwhelms local infrastructure like schools and roads, and destroys protected green spaces.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government allow housing developers to build on the Green Belt?

The Green Belt is a policy for controlling urban growth in the UK, consisting of a buffer zone of open land around major cities where building is heavily restricted. Its original purpose was to prevent urban sprawl and keep land open for agriculture and recreation. Proponents of building on the Green Belt argue that the rigid restrictions have choked the supply of land, causing a severe housing shortage and skyrocketing prices that lock young people out of homeownership. Opponents argue that the Green Belt is the "lungs" of the city and essential for biodiversity, arguing that the focus should be on regenerating "brownfield" (previously developed) land within cities instead of destroying the countryside.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should landlords be allowed to evict tenants without providing a specific reason?

The UK government has debated banning "Section 21" notices, which currently allow landlords to evict tenants with two months' notice without providing any reason. Proponents of a ban argue it is essential to stop "revenge evictions" and provide stability for families renting their homes. Opponents, particularly landlord associations, argue that removing this mechanism will cause landlords to sell up and leave the market, ultimately reducing the supply of rental homes and driving up prices.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government incentivize the construction of affordable housing?

Incentives could include financial support or tax breaks for developers to build housing that is affordable for low- and middle-income families. Proponents argue that it increases the supply of affordable housing and addresses housing shortages. Opponents argue that it interferes with the housing market and can be costly for taxpayers.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should new housing developments be required to include green spaces and parks?

Green spaces in housing developments are areas designated for parks and natural landscapes to enhance residents' quality of life and environmental health. Proponents argue that it enhances community well-being and environmental quality. Opponents argue that it increases the cost of housing and developers should decide the layout of their projects.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government provide subsidies for first-time homebuyers?

These subsidies are financial aids from the government to help individuals purchase their first home, making homeownership more accessible. Proponents argue that it helps people afford their first home and promotes homeownership. Opponents argue that it distorts the housing market and could lead to higher prices.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government restrict the purchase of residential properties by foreign investors?

Restrictions would limit the ability of non-citizens to buy homes, aiming to keep housing prices affordable for local residents. Proponents argue that it helps maintain affordable housing for locals and prevents property speculation. Opponents argue that it deters foreign investment and can negatively impact the housing market.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government abolish stamp duty for first-time buyers on homes worth less than  £425,000?

In June 2024 Rishi Sunak unveiled a "new and improved" Help to Buy scheme which permanently abolish stamp duty for first-time buyers on homes up to £425,000, if he wins the general election. The Conservative manifesto - setting out the party's policy priorities for government - also includes a target of 1.6 million new homes over five years, slightly more than Labour is promising.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government increase funding for homeless shelters and services?

Increased funding would enhance the capacity and quality of shelters and services that provide support for homeless individuals. Proponents argue that it provides essential support for the homeless and helps reduce homelessness. Opponents argue that it is costly and may not address the root causes of homelessness.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should social housing tenants have the right to buy their rented homes at a discount?

The 'Right to Buy' is a policy introduced in the UK in 1980 that allows tenants of council housing to purchase the home they live in at a significant discount. Since its inception, millions of homes have been transferred from public to private ownership, significantly increasing the rate of home ownership among the working class. Proponents argue that the policy democratizes wealth and gives tenants a stake in their community. Opponents argue that because the sold homes were rarely replaced, the policy has decimated the stock of affordable social housing, forcing low-income families into expensive and insecure private rentals.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government provide assistance to homeowners facing foreclosure?

Assistance programs help homeowners who are at risk of losing their homes due to financial difficulties by providing financial support or restructuring loans. Proponents argue that it prevents people from losing their homes and stabilizes communities. Opponents argue that it encourages irresponsible borrowing and is unfair to those who pay their mortgages.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government implement stricter regulations on the use of cryptocurrencies?

Crypto technology offers tools like payment, lending, borrowing, and saving to anyone with an internet connection. Proponents argue that stricter regulations would deter criminal use. Opponents argue that stricter crypto regulation would limit financial opportunities to citizens that are denied access to or can't afford the fees associated with traditional banking.  Watch video

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government regulate artificial intelligence (AI) to ensure ethical use?

Regulating AI involves setting guidelines and standards to ensure AI systems are used ethically and safely. Proponents argue that it prevents misuse, protects privacy, and ensures AI benefits society. Opponents argue that excessive regulation could hinder innovation and technological advancement.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should artists be held to the same reporting and disclosure requirements as hedge funds, mutual funds, and public companies when selling their artwork?

In 2024, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) brought lawsuits against artists and art marketplaces, arguing that artwork should be classified as a security and subject to the same reporting and disclosure standards as financial institutions. Proponents argue that this would provide greater transparency and protect buyers from fraud, ensuring that the art market operates with the same accountability as financial markets. Opponents contend that such regulations are overly burdensome and would stifle creativity, making it nearly impossible for artists to sell their work without facing complex legal hurdles.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should citizens be allowed to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets that the government can monitor but not control?

Self-hosted digital wallets are personal, user-managed storage solutions for digital currencies like Bitcoin, which provide individuals with control over their funds without relying on third-party institutions. Monitoring refers to the government having the capability to oversee transactions without the ability to directly control or interfere with the funds. Proponents argue that it ensures personal financial freedom and security while allowing the government to monitor for illegal activities such as money laundering and terrorism financing. Opponents argue that even monitoring infringes on privacy rights and that self-hosted wallets should remain completely private and free from government oversight.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should AI companies be required to pay royalties to creators whose work was used to train their models?

This issue is central to current class-action lawsuits where artists allege AI models were illegally built on their intellectual property. Proponents argue tech companies are strip-mining human creativity to automate artists out of a job without consent. Opponents contend that AI 'learns' patterns rather than copying files, and restrictive laws would stifle innovation and hand a monopoly to the few giants wealthy enough to pay licensing fees.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should users be required to use a government ID to access social media accounts?

This proposal suggests that social media companies should be legally required to verify the age and identity of every user using government-issued documentation (like a passport or driving license) before they can create an account or post content. Proponents argue this is the only effective way to enforce age limits for children, eliminate bots, reduce cyberbullying, and hold people accountable for illegal hate speech. Opponents argue this would create a surveillance state, risk massive data breaches of personal documents, and silence whistleblowers, LGBTQ+ individuals in hostile households, or victims of domestic abuse who rely on online anonymity for safety.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government impose stricter regulations on the collection and use of personal data by companies?

Companies often collect personal data from users for various purposes, including advertising and improving services. Proponents argue that stricter regulations would protect consumer privacy and prevent data misuse. Opponents argue that it would burden businesses and hinder technological innovation.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government mandate that large tech companies share their algorithms with regulators?

Algorithms used by tech companies, such as those that recommend content or filter information, are often proprietary and closely guarded secrets. Proponents argue that transparency would prevent abuses and ensure fair practices. Opponents argue that it would harm business confidentiality and competitive advantage.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the London Underground be considered an "essential service" which would ban all future worker strikes?

An “essential service” classification prevents employees of a government service from staging full-scale strikes and walkouts. Services with the classification are required by law to provide minimum services during periods of industrial action. Proponents of the proposal argue that strikes by underground workers cause significant disruption to the country’s economy and people’s lives. Opponents argue that the proposal would prevent workers from exercising their rights.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government require all new cars to be electric or hybrid by a certain date?

Electric and hybrid vehicles use electricity and a combination of electricity and fuel, respectively, to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and decrease emissions. Proponents argue that it significantly cuts pollution and advances the transition to renewable energy sources. Opponents argue that it increases vehicle costs, limits consumer choice, and may strain the electric grid.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government increase spending on public transportation?

In the 2021/22 financial year, the government of the United Kingdom spent approximately 25.2 billion British pounds on Railways, compared with 6.6 billion on local roads, 5.5 billion on local public transport, 5.4 billion on national roads, and 2.4 billion on other forms of transport.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should cities implement congestion pricing to reduce traffic in busy urban areas?

Congestion pricing is a system where drivers are charged a fee to enter certain high-traffic areas during peak times, aiming to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. Proponents argue that it effectively reduces traffic and emissions while generating revenue for public transportation improvements. Opponents argue that it unfairly targets lower-income drivers and may simply shift congestion to other areas.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government impose stricter fuel efficiency standards on vehicles?

Fuel efficiency standards set the required average fuel economy for vehicles, aiming to reduce fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Proponents argue that it helps reduce emissions, save consumers money on fuel, and decrease reliance on fossil fuels. Opponents argue that it raises production costs, leading to higher vehicle prices, and may not have a significant impact on overall emissions.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government invest in the development of smart transportation infrastructure?

Smart transportation infrastructure uses advanced technology, such as smart traffic lights and connected vehicles, to improve traffic flow and safety. Proponents argue that it enhances efficiency, reduces congestion, and improves safety through better technology. Opponents argue that it is costly, may face technical challenges, and requires significant maintenance and upgrades.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government implement stricter emissions standards for diesel vehicles?

Diesel emissions standards regulate the amount of pollutants that diesel engines can emit to reduce air pollution. Proponents argue that stricter standards improve air quality and public health by reducing harmful emissions. Opponents argue that it increases costs for manufacturers and consumers and could reduce the availability of diesel vehicles.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government promote the use of bicycles by expanding bike lanes and bike-sharing programs?

Expanding bike lanes and bike-sharing programs encourages cycling as a sustainable and healthy mode of transportation. Proponents argue that it reduces traffic congestion, lowers emissions, and promotes a healthier lifestyle. Opponents argue that it can be costly, may take away road space from vehicles, and might not be widely used.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government increase penalties for distracted driving?

Distracted driving penalties aim to deter dangerous behaviors, such as texting while driving, to improve road safety. Proponents argue that it deters dangerous behavior, improves road safety, and reduces accidents caused by distractions. Opponents argue that penalties alone may not be effective and enforcement can be challenging.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government regulate airline frequent flier programs?

In September 2024 the U.S. Transportation Department began an investigation into U.S. airline’s frequent flier programs. The department's inquiry centers on practices that it describes as potentially unfair, deceptive or anti-competitive, with a focus on four areas: changes to the value of points that the agency said can make it more expensive to book tickets using rewards; lack of fare transparency through dynamic pricing; fees for redeeming and transferring rewards; and reduction in competition among programs due to airline mergers.  “These rewards are controlled by a company that can unilaterally change their value. Our goal is to ensure consumers are getting the value that was promised to them, which means validating that these programs are transparent and fair,” Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg said.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government subsidize ride-sharing services for low-income individuals?

Ride-sharing services, like Uber and Lyft, provide transportation options that can be subsidized to make them more affordable for low-income individuals. Proponents argue that it increases mobility for low-income individuals, reduces reliance on personal vehicles, and can reduce traffic congestion. Opponents argue that it is a misuse of public funds, may benefit ride-sharing companies more than individuals, and could discourage public transportation use.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should local councils be allowed to restrict car access in residential areas to create "Low Traffic Neighbourhoods"?

Low Traffic Neighbourhoods (LTNs) restrict motor vehicle access in residential streets using barriers or cameras to prevent cut-through traffic and encourage active travel. These schemes have sparked intense debate across the UK, pitting environmentalists and urban planners against drivers and libertarians who fear a "war on motorists." Proponents argue that LTNs improve air quality, reduce road danger, and create quieter, community-focused streets. Opponents contend that they simply displace traffic and pollution onto neighboring main roads, delay emergency services, and hurt local businesses by making access difficult.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government provide subsidies for the development of high-speed rail networks?

High-speed rail networks are fast train systems that connect major cities, providing a quick and efficient alternative to car and air travel. Proponents argue that it can reduce travel times, lower carbon emissions, and stimulate economic growth through improved connectivity. Opponents argue that it requires significant investment, may not attract enough users, and funds could be better used elsewhere.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government provide incentives for carpooling and the use of shared transportation services?

Incentives for carpooling and shared transportation encourage people to share rides, reducing the number of vehicles on the road and lowering emissions. Proponents argue that it reduces traffic congestion, lowers emissions, and promotes community interactions. Opponents argue that it may not significantly impact traffic, could be costly, and some people prefer the convenience of personal vehicles.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Do you support the construction of a high speed railway (HS2) connecting London to Birmingham?

High Speed 2 is a planned high-speed railway between London Euston to central Scotland. The project is being developed by High Speed Two Ltd, a company limited by guarantee established by the UK government. Four major city centres shall be served directly: London, Birmingham, Leeds and Manchester. From November 2021 to June 2022 substantial parts of HS2 were dropped. As part of the Integrated Rail Plan for the North and Midlands it was announced that most of the eastern leg of phase 2b from Birmingham via the East Midlands to Leeds/York would be dropped. Supporters of the project believe that the additional capacity and reliability provided by HS2 will cater for pre-COVID rising passenger numbers while driving further modal shift to rail. Opponents believe that the project is neither environmentally nor financially sustainable.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should cities designate special lanes for autonomous vehicles?

Special lanes for autonomous vehicles separate them from regular traffic, potentially improving safety and traffic flow. Proponents argue that dedicated lanes increase safety, enhance traffic efficiency, and encourage the adoption of autonomous technology. Opponents argue that it reduces road space for traditional vehicles and may not be justified given the current number of autonomous vehicles.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government restrict the use of advanced technology in vehicles to maintain human control and prevent over-reliance on technology?

This considers limiting the integration of advanced technologies in vehicles to ensure humans retain control and to prevent dependency on technological systems. Proponents argue that it preserves human control and prevents over-reliance on potentially fallible technology. Opponents argue that it hinders technological progress and the benefits that advanced technology can bring to safety and efficiency.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government introduce a nationwide ban on parking vehicles on pavements?

Pavement (sidewalk) parking is currently illegal in London and Scotland, but remains a grey area across much of the rest of the UK, leaving local councils to navigate enforcement. Supporters argue a nationwide ban is essential for accessibility, citing that blocked pavements force disabled individuals, the elderly, and families with pushchairs into the street. Opponents argue that a blanket ban is impractical for millions of households living on narrow, historic terraced streets where parking fully on the road would block ambulances, fire engines, and refuse collection vehicles.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the UK assassinate suspected terrorists in foreign countries?

In 2015 Prime Minister David Cameron announced that it would increase the number of drone against suspected British terrorists to thwart potential attacks. On August 21 2015 U.K. drones killed two British jihadists in Syria – the first time the U.K. killed a Briton with a drone strike. In 2022 human rights groups accused the UK military of “targeting killing” when a drone killed Syrian arms dealer Abu Hamza al-Shuhail near Ras al-Ayn.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government use facial recognition technology for mass surveillance to enhance public safety?

Facial recognition technology uses software to identify individuals based on their facial features, and can be used to monitor public spaces and enhance security measures. Proponents argue that it enhances public safety by identifying and preventing potential threats, and helps in locating missing persons and criminals. Opponents argue that it infringes on privacy rights, can lead to misuse and discrimination, and raises significant ethical and civil liberties concerns.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government ban its citizens from using cross-border payment methods (like crypto) to send money to relatives in OFAC sanctioned countries (Palestine, Iran, Cuba, Venezuela, Russia, and North Korea)?

Cross-border payment methods, such as cryptocurrencies, allow individuals to transfer money internationally, often bypassing traditional banking systems. The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctions countries for various political and security reasons, restricting financial transactions with these nations. Proponents argue that such a ban prevents financial support to regimes considered hostile or dangerous, ensuring compliance with international sanctions and national security policies. Opponents argue that it restricts humanitarian aid to families in need, infringes on personal freedoms, and that cryptocurrencies can provide a lifeline in crisis situations.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government implement a national identification system to enhance security and prevent fraud?

A national identification system is a standardized ID system that provides a unique identification number or card to all citizens, which can be used to verify identity and access various services. Proponents argue that it enhances security, streamlines identification processes, and helps prevent identity fraud. Opponents argue that it raises privacy concerns, could lead to increased government surveillance, and may infringe on individual freedoms.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government require tech companies to provide backdoor access to encrypted communications for national security purposes?

Backdoor access means that tech companies would create a way for government authorities to bypass encryption, allowing them to access private communications for surveillance and investigation. Proponents argue that it helps law enforcement and intelligence agencies prevent terrorism and criminal activities by providing necessary access to information. Opponents argue that it compromises user privacy, weakens overall security, and could be exploited by malicious actors.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government invest in artificial intelligence (AI) for defense applications?

AI in defense refers to the use of artificial intelligence technologies to enhance military capabilities, such as autonomous drones, cyber defense, and strategic decision-making. Proponents argue that AI can significantly enhance military effectiveness, provide strategic advantages, and improve national security. Opponents argue that AI poses ethical risks, potential loss of human control, and can lead to unintended consequences in critical situations.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government allow citizens who left to join foreign terrorist organizations to return to the UK?

This highly emotional debate centers on individuals like Shamima Begum, who left the UK as a teenager to join ISIS in Syria. Under international law, it is generally illegal to leave a person stateless, but the UK government has utilized broad powers to strip citizenship from dual-nationals deemed a threat to the public. Proponents of repatriation argue that the UK must take responsibility for its own radicalized citizens and prosecute them in British courts rather than burdening unstable regions. Opponents argue that allowing traitors to return poses an unacceptable security risk and serves as an insult to the victims of terrorism.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should foreign visitors have to pay for emergency medical treatment during their stay in the UK?

Overseas visitors to the UK are currently charged for hospital visits, dental treatments and prescription drugs. People working for UK-based employers and students on courses of at least six months duration are entitled to at least some NHS hospital treatment free of charge. The government had considered charging for GP consultations, but decided that easy initial access was important to prevent risks to public health such as HIV, TB and sexually transmitted infections.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should there be more or less privatisation of the NHS?

The National Health Service is the publicly funded national healthcare system for the UK. It provides mostly free healthcare to all legal English residents. In 2015 the NHS spent 10% of its budget on private providers.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government fund the World Health Organization?

The World Health Organization was founded in 1948 and is a specialized agency of the United Nations whose main objective is “the attainment by all peoples of the highest possible level of health.” The organization provides technical assistance to countries, sets international health standards and guidelines, and collects data on global health issues through the World Health Survey. The WHO has led global public health efforts including the development of an Ebola Vaccine and the near-eradication of polio and smallpox. The organization is run by a decision-making body composed of representatives from 194 countries. It is funded by voluntary contributions from member countries and private donors. In 2018 and 2019 the WHO had a $5 billion budget and the leading contributors were the United States (15%) , the EU (11%) and the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation (9%). Supporters of the WHO argue that cutting funding will hamper the international fight against the Covid-19 pandemic and sap the U.S. of global influence.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Do you support the legalisation of Marijuana?

The UK government currently bans the sale and possession of all forms of marijuana. Medical cannabis is legal for cases of severe epilepsy, vomiting or nausea caused by chemotherapy or multiple sclerosis.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government ban the promotion of products that contribute to unhealthy lifestyles for young people, such as vaping and junk food?

Vaping refers to using electronic cigarettes that deliver nicotine through vapor, while junk food includes high-calorie, low-nutrition foods like candy, chips, and sugary drinks. Both are linked to various health issues, especially among young people. Proponents argue that banning promotion helps protect the health of young people, reduces the risk of developing lifelong unhealthy habits, and decreases public health costs. Opponents argue that such bans infringe on commercial free speech, limit consumer choice, and that education and parental guidance are more effective ways to promote healthy lifestyles.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should cities open drug “safe havens” where people who are addicted to illegal drugs can use them under the supervision of medical professionals?

In 2018, officials in the U.S. city of Philadelphia city proposed opening a “safe haven” in an effort to combat the city's heroin epidemic. In 2016 64,070 people died in the U.S. from drug overdoses - a 21% increase from 2015. 3/4 of drug overdose deaths in the U.S. are caused by the opioid class of drugs which includes prescription painkillers, heroin and fentanyl. To combat the epidemic cities including Vancouver, BC and Sydney, AUS opened safe havens where addicts can inject drugs under the supervision of medical professionals. The safe havens reduce the overdose death rate by insuring the addicted patients are given drugs that are not contaminated or poisoned. Since 2001 5,900 people have overdosed at a safe haven in Sydney, Australia but no one has died. Proponents argue that the safe havens are the only proven solution to lower the overdose fatality rate and prevent the spread of diseases like HIV-AIDS. Opponents argue that safe havens may encourage illegal drug use and re-direct funding from traditional treatment centers.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government impose a tax on ultra-processed foods?

Ultra-processed foods (UPFs), such as fizzy drinks, nuggets, and packaged snacks, have been linked to rising obesity rates and chronic illnesses. Proponents of the tax argue it is a necessary intervention to reduce consumption of unhealthy additives and save the NHS billions in preventable treatment costs. Opponents argue it is a regressive 'Nanny State' tax that unfairly punishes low-income families who rely on cheap, long-lasting processed foods during a cost-of-living crisis.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should medical boards penalize doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus?

In 2022 lawmakers in the U.S. state of California passed legislation which empowered the state medical board to discipline doctors in the state who “disseminate misinformation or disinformation” that contradicts the “contemporary scientific consensus” or is “contrary to the standard of care.” Proponents of the law argue that doctors should be punished for spreading misinformation and that there is clear consensus on certain issues such as that apples contain sugar, measles is caused by a virus, and Down syndrome is caused by a chromosomal abnormality. Opponents argue that the law limits freedom of speech and scientific “consensus” often changes within mere months.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Do you support a single-payer healthcare system?

Single-payer healthcare is a system where every citizen pays the government to provide core healthcare services for all residents. Under this system the government may provide the care themselves or pay a private healthcare provider to do so. In a single-payer system all residents receive healthcare regardless of age, income or health status. Countries with single-payer healthcare systems include the U.K., Canada, Taiwan, Israel, France, Belarus, Russia and Ukraine.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the NHS provide expensive weight-loss injections to anyone suffering from obesity?

A new generation of GLP-1 weight-loss drugs, such as Wegovy and Ozempic, have proven highly clinically effective at suppressing appetite and inducing significant weight loss. With over a quarter of UK adults classified as obese, the government is actively considering heavily rolling out these injections on the taxpayer-funded National Health Service (NHS) to improve public health and get sick people back to work. Proponents argue that funding these 'miracle jabs' is a mathematically sound investment that will drastically reduce the catastrophic long-term burden of obesity-related illnesses on hospitals. Opponents argue that these drugs are unsustainably expensive, require lifelong use to keep the weight off, and distractingly divert desperately needed funds away from critical care and structural health reforms.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should AI be allowed to diagnose patients and prescribe medicine without human doctor supervision?

Stats Discuss

Should the government pay for elderly social care so people don't have to sell their homes?

The UK faces an aging population crisis where social care costs—such as nursing homes and daily assistance—can bankrupt families, forcing them to sell family homes to pay bills. Unlike the NHS, social care is not universally free. Proponents argue that dementia patients are unfairly penalized compared to cancer patients, whose treatment is free. Opponents argue that state-funded care is an unfair transfer of wealth from young, working taxpayers to preserve the inheritances of asset-rich retirees.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should prescription charges be abolished for everyone in England, as they are in the rest of the UK?

In the UK, patients in Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland receive NHS prescriptions completely free of charge, whereas most working-age adults in England must pay a standard fee per item. Health charities and campaigners argue that these charges act as a barrier to healthcare, forcing people on low incomes to skip vital medications, which ultimately costs the NHS more when their conditions worsen. The government and fiscal conservatives argue that the hundreds of millions of pounds generated annually by these fees provide essential funding to keep the NHS afloat, noting that broad exemptions already exist for children, the elderly, and those on certain benefits. Proponents support abolition to ensure universal healthcare access and eliminate health inequalities across the UK. Opponents oppose abolition because the NHS relies on this vital revenue stream to maintain frontline services.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government increase funding for mental health research and treatment?

The NHS provides mental health services free of charge. From 2019 to 2023 mental health is in line to get £2.3bn of the extra £20bn going on the NHS.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government raise the salaries of NHS workers in order to reduce wait times?

In October 2023, it emerged that the number of people waiting longer than 18 months for NHS treatment in England was growing. Data analysed by PA Media last month suggested that, despite recent decreases in the waiting list in England, it was still higher than when Sunak’s pledge was made. The list stood at 7.21m outstanding treatments in January 2023. In November, NHS England figures showed 7.61m treatments were yet to be carried out. NHS workers, many of whom have seen substantial pay cuts in real terms under Conservative governments, have been exercising their right to take industrial action to secure better terms. Unions have consistently said ministers could avoid strikes by offering better pay deals. And government ministers have acknowledged privately they would end up needing to do so despite having spent months publicly insisting they would take no such step.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should private firms reimburse the NHS if they exceed a 5% profit on contracts?

Ed Miliband launched Labour’s election campaign with a promise to cap the amount of profit a private contractor can make from NHS contracts. Under the proposal private firms would be limited to profit margins of 5% on all contracts above £500,000. Proponents argue that the plan will stop the NHS’s "drive to privatisation." Opponents argue that limiting private contractor’s profits will make it harder for the NHS to keep up with rising demand for care.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should Members of Parliament be banned from holding paid second jobs?

The debate over MP second jobs centers on potential conflicts of interest versus the value of external experience. Critics, citing recent lobbying scandals, argue that paid consultancy roles allow corporations to buy political influence and distract MPs from their constituents. Defenders maintain that banning all second jobs would create a class of career politicians with no real-world skills and would unfairly penalize professionals like doctors or lawyers who wish to maintain their certifications while serving. Proponents argue that a strict ban restores public trust and integrity to the democratic process. Opponents argue that transparency measures are sufficient and that a ban would deter high-caliber candidates from entering politics.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should the government establish an independent regulator to oversee English football clubs?

Following the collapse of historic clubs like Bury FC and the attempted breakaway European Super League, the government proposed a statutory independent regulator to ensure financial sustainability in the 'beautiful game.' This regulator would have the power to block teams from joining breakaway leagues and apply a stricter 'owners and directors test' to prevent money laundering or human rights abusers from buying clubs. Proponents argue that football clubs are cultural heritage assets, not just businesses, and require protection from reckless capitalism. Opponents argue that the Premier League is a massive economic success story and government interference—or 'red tape'—could scare away investors and reduce the quality of football.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should there be a total ban on private sector representatives meeting with ministers without public logs?

Lobbying involves private sector representatives meeting with government officials to influence policy decisions. Some proposals require full public transparency of such meetings. Proponents argue strict bans without public logs prevent corruption and hidden influence. Opponents argue that private dialogue is sometimes necessary for effective policymaking.

Learn more Stats Discuss

Should Members of Parliament be banned from trading individual stocks while in office?

Scandals involving politicians allegedly profiting from privileged knowledge during crises have sparked demands for stricter financial regulations on lawmakers. Currently, MPs must declare their financial interests, but critics argue this is insufficient to prevent subtle policy manipulation. Proponents argue a ban is essential to eliminate blatant conflicts of interest and restore faith in a system plagued by cronyism. Opponents argue that existing laws are sufficient and that forcing politicians to liquidate their portfolios is an unfair penalty that discourages experienced business leaders from public service.

Learn more Stats Discuss